Abstract:Most recent studies on the emergence of family firms have focused on their social context,such as the firms' culture,ideas or traditions.These elements are also fundamentals of this study; although they are abstract explanations from social capital perspective and lack stringent and concrete economic evidence.This paper sets out for the first time how the formation of contemporary family firms in China is linked with core employee turnover and the behavior of these employees in then starting their own businesses,which is particularly important in a transitional economy.During the marketization and development of a modern economy,corporation competitiveness is usually embodied in its human resources,while core employees are the major foundation of such competitive advantage. For instance,in a customer-oriented trading company,key customer information is held by the sales-persons.Likewise,in a technology-oriented high-tech company,the technology personnel have access to its most valuable-asset-technological information.When an economy is in transformation,certain institutional barriers exist,(e.g. intellectual property rights or business secrets are not well protected by law),general barriers to start a business are low and the professional manager market is underdeveloped.This paper argues that under such conditions,companies have the tendency to operate as a family firm to prevent new competition from its former employees in the same industry,and such measures are regarded as a means of self-protection.The paper confirms the above conclusion with analysis of theoretical models as well as examples.The objective of the paper is to display the rationality of family firms in a transitional economy.If China is to establish modern institutions for business management with separate ownership and management rights,it will be necessary to protect business property rights,particularly in keeping business secrets safe from short-term personnel.The paper sets out original thinking linking‘start-up'and‘entrepreneurial management'-two important areas in business administration-as a way to explain the incentives of family firms in a transitional system .

Business Exit As A Deliberate Strategy for Incumbent Firms

Toward A Typology of Exit Strategies

Hiring a Family CEO or a Non-family CEO? Research on the CEO Successor Choice Based on Heterogeneous Goals of Controlling Families

Is Organizational Ambidexterity Always Beneficial to Family-Managed SMEs? Evidence from China

Exit from a Foreign Market: Do Poor Performance, Strategic Fit, Cultural Distance, and International Experience Matter?

Retiring entrepreneurs and succession planning: does entry mode determine exit strategy?

Understanding firm exit: a systematic literature review

The impact of changing disclosure requirements, competition, and private capital on firm exit methods and premiums

Individual Propensity,Family's Commitment and the Extent of Succession Planning

Successful Strategies for Transferring a Family Business from One Generation to the Next

Exit game with private information

Building continuity into strategy

When Do Firms Use Interim Succession? an Adverse Selection Framework

Revolutionary Innovation and the Incumbent Business: Patterns of Relationship and Coping Strategies

Demand Uncertainty, Dynamic Learning and Exit in Competitive Markets

Collapse of Better Place: A Managerial Cognition Perspective on the Failure of an Entrepreneurial Initiative

The relationship between firm life cycle and firm strategies: A systematic review and future direction

The Conduct of Demission to Start-ups and Family Firms in Transition

Entrepreneurial Motivation Mechanism in Venture Capital Exit Decisions

Interim CEO as A Firm Strategy: An Information Asymmetry Framework

CEO Exit after IPO: Which Wealth Matters?