Interindividual Variability in the Dose-Specific Effect of Dopamine on Carotid Chemoreceptor Sensitivity to Hypoxia

Jacqueline K. Limberg,Blair D. Johnson,Walter W. Holbein,Sushant M. Ranadive,Michael T. Mozer,Michael J. Joyner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00723.2015
2016-01-01
Journal of Applied Physiology
Abstract:Human studies use varying levels of low-dose (1-4 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1)) dopamine to examine peripheral chemosensitivity, based on its known ability to blunt carotid body responsiveness to hypoxia. However, the effect of dopamine on the ventilatory responses to hypoxia is highly variable between individuals. Thus we sought to determine 1) the dose response relationship between dopamine and peripheral chemosensitivity as assessed by the ventilatory response to hypoxia in a cohort of healthy adults, and 2) potential confounding cardiovascular responses at variable low doses of dopamine. Young, healthy adults (n = 30, age = 32 ± 1, 24 male/6 female) were given intravenous (iv) saline and a range of iv dopamine doses (1-4 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1)) prior to and throughout five hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) tests. Subjects initially received iv saline, and after each HVR the dopamine infusion rate was increased by 1 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1). Tidal volume, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were continuously measured. Dopamine significantly reduced HVR at all doses (P < 0.05). When subjects were divided into high (n = 13) and low (n = 17) baseline chemosensitivity, dopamine infusion (when assessed by dose) reduced HVR in the high group only (P < 0.01), with no effect of dopamine on HVR in the low group (P > 0.05). Dopamine infusion also resulted in a reduction in blood pressure (3 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1)) and total peripheral resistance (1-4 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1)), driven primarily by subjects with low baseline chemosensitivity. In conclusion, we did not find a single dose of dopamine that elicited a nadir HVR in all subjects. Additionally, potential confounding cardiovascular responses occur with dopamine infusion, which may limit its usage.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?