Analysis of the Loss of Pool Cooling Accident in a PWR Spent Fuel Pool with MAAP5

Xiaoli Wu,Wei Li,Yapei Zhang,Wenxi Tian,Guanghui Su,Suizheng Qiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.05.030
IF: 1.9
2014-01-01
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Abstract:The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident shows that it is necessary to study potential severe accidents and corresponding mitigation measures for the spent fuel pool (SFP) of a nuclear power plant (NPP). This paper presents the analysis of loss of pool cooling accident scenarios and the discussion of mitigation measures for the SFP at a pressurized water reactor (PWR) NPP with the MAAP5 code. Analysis of uncompensated loss of water due to the loss of pool cooling with different initial pool water levels of 12.2 m (designated as a reference case) and 10.7 m have been performed based on a MAAP5 input model. Scenarios of the accident such as overheating of uncovered fuel assemblies, oxidation of claddings and hydrogen generation, loss of intactness of fuel rod claddings, and release of radioactive fission products were predicted with the assumption that mitigation measures were unavailable. The results covered a broad spectrum of severe accident evaluations in the SFP. Furthermore, as important mitigation measures, the effects of recovering the SFP cooling system and makeup water in SFP on the accident progressions have also been investigated respectively based on the events of pool water boiling and spent fuels uncovery. Based upon the reference case, three cases with the recovery of SFP cooling system and three other cases with makeup water in SFP have been studied. The results showed that, severe accident might happen if SFP cooling system was not restored timely before the spent fuels started to become uncovered; spent fuels could be completely submerged and severe accident might be avoided if SFP makeup water system provided water with a mass flow rate larger than the average evaporation rate defined as the division of pool water mass above the top of the spent fuel assemblies by the amount of time to start uncovering the spent fuel assemblies when no mitigation measures were taken. Although spent fuel assemblies were partly exposed due to the mass flow rate of makeup water being smaller than the average evaporation rate, continuous steam cooling and radiation heat transfer might maintain the spent fuels coolability as the actual evaporation was balanced by the makeup in a period of time of the order of several days. However, larger makeup rate should be guaranteed to ensure the long-term safety of SFP. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?