Abstract:Developing students' critical thinking skills in writing is essential in different educational contexts. However, the analysis of the argument structure in non-English-major undergraduate students' writing remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to analyze the structure of argumentative English papers written by Chinese university students, based on the adapted Toulmin model of argument structure constituting six elements (claim, data, counterargument claim, counterargument data, rebuttal claim, and rebuttal data). The participants in this study were a class of 47 sophomores enrolled in the course "Modern Education Technology" at Zhejiang University, China. They were required to identify the components of the argument structure in a pre-assigned short text with two opposing views, and to write an argumentative essay. Content analysis was used to assess the students' CT and argument structures. In both tasks, the results found that the majority of the students could identify author's claim with at least a piece of data. They also stated their own claims and provided at least one piece of data to back these up. However, a majority failed to identify the author's counter argument and even though many stated the counter argument claims in their essays, most were unjustified. The majority did not state a conclusion in both tasks. This study may be beneficial in understanding non-English major-undergraduate students' critical thinking skills in English writing and the results suggest that L2 essay writing instructors should use active and explicit methods such as computer-assisted argument mapping tools like RationaleTM to help learners master the argument structure. Some pedagogic guidelines are listed for the implementation of the RationaleTM software in the L2 classroom.

Nominal stance construction in L1 and L2 students' writing

Analyzing Critical Thinking Elements in the Argument Structure of Non-English-Major Chinese Undergraduate Students' Writing

Functional analysis of stance nouns in English Language Teaching research articles

Stance And Voice In Academic Writing The "Noun Plus That" Construction And Disciplinary Variation

Does Eap Affect Written L2 Academic Stance? A Longitudinal Learner Corpus Study

A corpus-based comparison of linguistic markers of stance and genre in the academic writing of novice and advanced engineering learners

Stance and voice in academic writing

Fostering Stance-Taking as a Sustainable Goal in Developing EFL Students’ Academic Writing Skills: Exploring the Effects of Explicit Instruction on Academic Writing Skills and Stance Deployment

Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance

A Cross-Linguistic Study of Stance Strategies in Abstracts of Linguistics Articles

Systematic Literature Review of Crosslinguistic Analysis of Stance Markers in EFL Learners’ Academic Writing in English

Writing with Attitude: Stance Expression in Learner and Professional Dentistry Research Reports

The Stance Study of Evaluative That Clauses in English Abstracts of Chinese Master Theses

Schematic Structure and Stance in Students’ Writing in Business Communication: A Comparative Study of Native English Speaking and Iranian Students

ATTITUDE IN ABSTRACTS: STANCE EXPRESSION IN TRANSLATION PRACTICE REPORTS AND INTERPRETATION PRACTICE REPORTS BY CHINESE STUDENTS

Effects of teacher explicit instruction in stance-taking on students' perceptions of stance and on their academic writing beliefs

"We may conclude that:" a corpus-based study of stance-taking in conclusion sections of RAs across cultures and disciplines

Investigating the psychological reality of argument structure constructions and N1 of N2 constructions: a comparison between L1 and L2 speakers of English

A Corpus-Based Study between L1 and L2 English Academic Experts: Linking-Adverbial Usage in Linguistics Research Articles

Nouns and Academic Interactions: A Neglected Feature of Metadiscourse

Interactions in EFL argumentative writing: effects of topic, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on interactional metadiscourse