First-principles Calculation of the Indentation Strength Offeb4

Bing Li,Hong Sun,Changfeng Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.90.014106
IF: 3.7
2014-01-01
Physical Review B
Abstract:A recent experiment [H. Y. Gou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 157002 (2013)] reported a measured Vickers hardness of over 60 GPa for FeB4, placing it as a superhard material far above all other similar ultrahard transition-metal borides, such as ReB2, WB4, and especially CrB4, which has the same crystalline structure as that of FeB4 but a much lower measured Vickers hardness of around 23 GPa. This result, however, is contradicted by theoretical calculations that predict a smaller shear modulus for FeB4 than that of CrB4, indicating that FeB4 is softer than CrB4. Here we report first-principles calculations that aim to understand the stress response of FeB4 under indentation loadings and examine whether there exists a strain-stiffening effect that might enhance the indentation strength. Our results show that there is no strain stiffening in FeB4; instead, the normal pressure beneath the indenter drives a lateral structural expansion which further stretches and weakens the boron-boron and boron-iron bonds in addition to that caused by the shear deformation in Vickers indentation tests. This effect leads to a considerably reduced strength of FeB4, producing an ideal (i.e., an upper bound) indentation strength of 17 GPa that is lower than that (27 GPa) predicted for CrB4. The present results suggest that FeB4 is unlikely to be superhard and further experimental investigation is needed to clarify this issue.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?