Enhancing the Vickers hardness of Yttrium borides through bond optimization

Yong Pan,Jiaxin Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108428
IF: 3.8
2024-02-23
Materials Today Communications
Abstract:The hard nature of transition metal boride reminds a conundrum. Compared to the diboride, we propose that the high hardness of transition metal boride strongly depends on the structural feature and bonding state (bond type, bond number and bond direction) in addition to the network B-B covalent bond. To demonstrate our idea, we symmetrically study the structural configuration, hardness, elastic properties and bonding state of the B-rich Y-B borides by using the first-principles method. The hexagonal YB 2 , tetragonal YB 4 , cubic YB 6 and cubic YB 12 are studied. The convex hull implies that YB 4 has better thermodynamic stability in comparison to the YB 2 , YB 6 and YB 12 . Importantly, it is found that the calculated Vickers hardness of the cubic YB 12 is 41.4 GPa, indicating that YB 12 is a potential superhard material. However, the Vickers hardness of YB 2 , YB 4 and YB 6 is lower than 40 GPa. Naturally, the high harness of YB 12 is determined by the network B-B covalent bond. For non-superhard materials (YB 2 , YB 4 and YB 6 ), the hardness is related not only to the 3D network B-B covalent bond but also to the structural feature and bond state, particularly for TM-B bond. Compared to the strong B-B covalent bond, the Y-B bond plays an important role in harness because the Y-B bond is not surrounded by the 3D network B-B covalent bond. Therefore, we believe that the bond type and bond arrangement play an important role in hardness. This work can provide new design rule to adjust the structural feature and bond state to enhance the Vickers hardness of transition metal borides superhard materials.
materials science, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?