Cavotricuspid‐Dependent Atrial Flutter in Patients with Prior Atriotomy: 12‐lead ECG Interpretation and Electroanatomical Characteristics

Wei Ma,Fengmin Lu,Dongyan Wu,Bingwei Chen,Hongliang Cong,Reginald Liew,Jing Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12722
IF: 2.7
2015-01-01
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Abstract:Cavotricuspid-Dependent Atrial Flutter in Patients With Prior AtriotomyBackgroundThe aim of this study was to describe the electrocardiogram (ECG) morphology and electroanatomical characteristics of counterclockwise tricuspid annular atrial flutter (CCWTA-AFL) in the patients with prior atriotomy.Methods and ResultsThis retrospective study included 34 patients with CCWTA-AFL after cardiac surgery and 20 patients with typical CCWTA-AFL without prior surgery. For patients in the postsurgical group, 19 had single-loop CCWTA-AFL and 15 had a double loop CCWTA-AFL. For single loop CCWTA-AFL the F-wave in lead I was very flat in l7 of 19 patients. The F-wave morphology in the inferior leads and V1 were found to be similar to typical AFL in 14 of 19 patients. For double loop CCWTA-AFL, F-waves were positive in lead I in 13 out of 15 patients. A long isoelectric activation was measured between F-waves in most of the patients. The presence of isoelectric segments between F-waves suggested a double loop AFL, which had a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 100%. Moreover, flat F-waves in lead I suggested a single loop AFL, which had a sensitivity of 89.5% and specificity of 86.7%. All patients in the group without prior cardiac surgery had typical ECGs features of CCWTA-AFL. None of the patients showed isoelectric segments between F-waves in the inferior leads. The amplitudes of most of the leads were higher than those for single loop CCWTA-AFL in patients with prior surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?