Long-term outcomes after catheter ablation for idiopathic atypical atrial flutter

Daisuke Yakabe,Kisho Ohtani,Masahiro Araki,Shujiro Inoue,Toshihiro Nakamura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.051
IF: 6.779
Heart Rhythm
Abstract:Background: Idiopathic atypical (non-cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent) atrial flutter (IAAFL) may be seen in patients without structural heart disease and without previous cardiac surgery or ablation. Objective: This study sought to determine the patient characteristics, electrophysiologic and electroanatomic properties, and clinical outcomes after ablation in patients with IAAFL. Methods: We retrospectively compared IAAFL patients with cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent AFL (C-AFL) patients undergoing catheter ablation. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, ischemic stroke, and hospitalization for worsening of heart failure. Results: Of 180 patients who underwent catheter ablation for AFL, 89 were included in this study (22 IAAFL and 67 C-AFL). Electrophysiologic study showed significantly longer intra-atrial conduction time and lower atrial voltage during sinus rhythm in the IAAFL group compared with the C-AFL group. The atrial scar was observed in all 22 IAAFL patients, with the most common sites being the posterior or lateral wall of the right atrium in 10 (45.5%) and the anterior wall of the left atrium in 8 (36.4%). During 3.5 ± 2.8 years of follow-up, the composite primary end point occurred significantly more frequently in the IAAFL group (hazard ratio [HR], 3.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-9.89; P = .015). In multivariable analysis, brain natriuretic peptide levels (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01, per 1 pg/mL; P = .01) and IAAFL (HR, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.21-14.07; P = .02) were independently associated with the primary outcome. Conclusion: IAAFL in patients had distinct electrophysiologic features suggestive of atrial cardiomyopathy. These patients are at risk for development of cardiovascular adverse events after ablation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?