Abstract:Developing novel catalysts with high efficiency and selectivity is critical for enabling future clean energy conversion technologies. Interfaces in catalyst systems have long been considered the most critical factor in controlling catalytic reaction mechanisms. Interfaces include not only the catalyst surface but also interfaces within catalyst particles and those formed by constructing heterogeneous catalysts. The atomic and electronic structures of catalytic surfaces govern the kinetics of binding and release of reactant molecules from surface atoms. Interfaces within catalysts are introduced to enhance the intrinsic activity and stability of the catalyst by tuning the surface atomic and chemical structures. Examples include interfaces between the core and shell, twin or domain boundaries, or phase boundaries within single catalyst particles. In supported catalyst nanoparticles (NPs), the interface between the metallic NP and support serves as a critical tuning factor for enhancing catalytic activity. Surface electronic structure can be indirectly tuned and catalytically active sites can be increased through the use of supporting oxides. Tuning interfaces in catalyst systems has been identified as an important strategy in the design of novel catalysts. However, the governing principle of how interfaces contribute to catalyst behavior, especially in terms of interactions with intermediates and their stability during electrochemical operation, are largely unknown. This is mainly due to the evolving nature of such interfaces. Small changes in the structural and chemical configuration of these interfaces may result in altering the catalytic performance. These interfacial arrangements evolve continuously during synthesis, processing, use, and even static operation. A technique that can probe the local atomic and electronic interfacial structures with high precision while monitoring the dynamic interfacial behavior in situ is essential for elucidating the role of interfaces and providing deeper insight for fine-tuning and optimizing catalyst properties. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) has long been a primary characterization technique used for studying nanomaterials because of its exceptional imaging resolution and simultaneous chemical analysis. Over the past decade, advances in STEM, that is, the commercialization of both aberration correctors and monochromators, have significantly improved the spatial and energy resolution. Imaging atomic structures with subangstrom resolution and identifying chemical species with single-atom sensitivity are now routine for STEM. These advancements have greatly benefitted catalytic research. For example, the roles of lattice strain and surface elemental distribution and their effect on catalytic stability and reactivity have been well documented in bimetallic catalysts. In addition, three-dimensional atomic structures revealed by STEM tomography have been integrated in theoretical modeling for predictive catalyst NP design. Recent developments in stable electronic and mechanical devices have opened opportunities to monitor the evolution of catalysts in operando under synthesis and reaction conditions; high-speed direct electron detectors have achieved sub-millisecond time resolutions and allow for rapid structural and chemical changes to be captured. Investigations of catalysts using these latest microscopy techniques have provided new insights into atomic-level catalytic mechanisms. Further integration of new microscopy methods is expected to provide multidimensional descriptions of interfaces under relevant synthesis and reaction conditions. In this Account, we discuss recent insights on understanding catalyst activity, selectivity, and stability using advanced STEM techniques, with an emphasis on how critical interfaces dictate the performance of precious metal-based heterogeneous catalysts. The role of extended interfacial structures, including those between core and shell, between separate phases and twinned grains, between the catalyst surface and gas, and between metal and support are discussed. We also provide an outlook on how emerging electron microscopy techniques, such as vibrational spectroscopy and electron ptychography, will impact future catalysis research.

Some Recent Advances in Gold-Based Catalysis Facilitated by Aberration Corrected Analytical Electron Microscopy

Alternative Mechanisms for Translesion Dna Synthesis

Interfaces in Heterogeneous Catalysts: Advancing Mechanistic Understanding through Atomic-Scale Measurements

High resolution electron microscopy for heterogeneous catalysis research

Recent Progress in High‐entropy Nanocatalysts

Visualizing Under‐Coordinated Surface Atoms on 3D Nanoporous Gold Catalysts

Combining In-Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy and Infrared Spectroscopy for Understanding Dynamic and Atomic-Scale Features of Supported Metal Catalysts

HRTEM and STEM-HAADF characterisation of Au-TiO2 and Au-Al2O3 catalysts for a better understanding of the parameters influencing their properties in CO oxidation

Unique Structural Characteristics of Catalytic Palladium/Gold Nanoparticles on Graphene

Quantitative Study of Au Catalytic Nanoparticles by Stem and Hrtem

Nanoparticles and Single Atoms in Commercial Carbon-Supported Platinum-Group Metal Catalysts

Atomically Dispersed Metals on Nanodiamond-Derived Hybrid Materials for Heterogeneous Catalysis

Single Atom Dynamics in Chemical Reactions

Hidden Impurities Generate False Positives in Single Atom Catalyst Imaging

In-situ 3D Imaging of Catalysis Induced Strain in Gold Nanoparticles

Progress in Research for High Performance Gold Nanocatalysts

Catalysis using gold containing materials

Advances in the understanding of the structure–performance relationships of 2D material catalysts based on electron microscopy

High-precision charge analysis in a catalytic nanoparticle by electron holography

Unveiling the Dynamic Electrocatalytic Activity of Online Synthesized Bimetallic Nanocatalysts Via Electrochemiluminescence Microscopy

An Atomic-Level Strategy for Unraveling Gold Nanocatalysis from the Perspective of Au(n)(SR)m Nanoclusters.