Abstract:Spatial autoregressive (SAR) and related models offer flexible yet parsimonious ways to model spatial and network interactions. SAR specifications typically rely on a particular parametric functional form and an exogenous choice of the so-called spatial weight matrix with only limited guidance from theory in making these specifications. Also, the choice of a SAR model over other alternatives, such as spatial Durbin (SD) or spatial lagged X (SLX) models, is often arbitrary, raising issues of potential specification error. To address such issues, this paper develops a new specification test within the SAR framework that can detect general forms of misspecification including that of the spatial weight matrix, the functional form and the model itself. The test is robust to the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form in the disturbances and the approach relates to the conditional moment test framework of Bierens ([1982, Journal of Econometrics 20, 105–134], [1990, Econometrica 58, 1443–1458]). The Bierens test is shown to be inconsistent in general against spatial alternatives and the new test introduces modifications to achieve test consistency in the spatial setting. A central element is the infinite-dimensional endogeneity induced by spatial linkages. This complexity is addressed by introducing a new component to the omnibus test that captures the effects of potential spatial matrix misspecification. With this modification, the approach leads to a simple pivotal test procedure with standard critical values that is the first test in the literature to have power against misspecifications in the spatial linkages. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test under the null hypothesis of correct SAR specification and prove consistency. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to study its finite sample performance. An empirical illustration on the performance of the test in modeling tax competition in Finland is included.

The C ( Α )-Type Gradient Test for Spatial Dependence in Spatial Autoregressive Models

Heteroskedasticity Robust Specification Testing In Spatial Autoregression

A parametric specification test for linear spatial autoregressive models

Testing for Spatial Lag Effects in Varying Coefficient Spatial Autoregressive Models

Testing the Structure of Conditional Correlations in Multivariate Garch Models: A Generalized Cross-Spectrum Approach

A simple spatial dependence test robust to local and distributional misspecifications

Detection of Spatial Heterogeneity Based on Spatial Autoregressive Varying Coefficient Models

Specification Test for Spatial Autoregressive Models

Heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators for spatial autoregressive models

Testing for Spatial Autocorrelation among the Residuals of the Geographically Weighted Regression

A Robust Test for Spatial Errors Models

Testing for Network and Spatial Autocorrelation

Asymptotic F-Test in a GMM Framework with Cross-Sectional Dependence

Testing spatial heteroscedasticity in mixed geographically weighted regression models

A Spatial Autoregression Model with Time-Varying Coefficients

Tests for time-varying coefficient spatial autoregressive panel data model with fixed effects

Semiparametric Gmm Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models

One‐sided Testing for Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Time Series Models

Spatial Autocorrelation Approaches to Testing Residuals from Least Squares Regression.

A goodness-of-fit test for regression models with spatially correlated errors