Abstract:Spatial autoregressive (SAR) and related models offer flexible yet parsimonious ways to model spatial and network interactions. SAR specifications typically rely on a particular parametric functional form and an exogenous choice of the so-called spatial weight matrix with only limited guidance from theory in making these specifications. Also, the choice of a SAR model over other alternatives, such as spatial Durbin (SD) or spatial lagged X (SLX) models, is often arbitrary, raising issues of potential specification error. To address such issues, this paper develops a new specification test within the SAR framework that can detect general forms of misspecification including that of the spatial weight matrix, the functional form and the model itself. The test is robust to the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form in the disturbances and the approach relates to the conditional moment test framework of Bierens ([1982, Journal of Econometrics 20, 105–134], [1990, Econometrica 58, 1443–1458]). The Bierens test is shown to be inconsistent in general against spatial alternatives and the new test introduces modifications to achieve test consistency in the spatial setting. A central element is the infinite-dimensional endogeneity induced by spatial linkages. This complexity is addressed by introducing a new component to the omnibus test that captures the effects of potential spatial matrix misspecification. With this modification, the approach leads to a simple pivotal test procedure with standard critical values that is the first test in the literature to have power against misspecifications in the spatial linkages. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test under the null hypothesis of correct SAR specification and prove consistency. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to study its finite sample performance. An empirical illustration on the performance of the test in modeling tax competition in Finland is included.

A Robust Test for Spatial Errors Models

A simple spatial dependence test robust to local and distributional misspecifications

Heteroskedasticity Robust Specification Testing In Spatial Autoregression

Spatial Hausman Test Based on Auxiliary Regression Model

A parametric specification test for linear spatial autoregressive models

Spatial Hausman Test of Panel Data

Testing for Spatial Lag Effects in Varying Coefficient Spatial Autoregressive Models

Spatial Correlation Tests of Panel Data Spatial Error Components Model

Specification Test for Spatial Autoregressive Models

Detection of Spatial Heterogeneity Based on Spatial Autoregressive Varying Coefficient Models

Spatially Varying Coefficient Models: Testing for Spatial Heteroscedasticity and Reweighting Estimation of the Coefficients

Testing spatial heteroscedasticity in mixed geographically weighted regression models

Robust Variable Selection with Exponential Squared Loss for the Spatial Error Model

Simulation Analysis of Power of Bootstrap Tests in Spatial Econometric Models

Tests for Spatial Dependence and Heterogeneity in Spatially Autoregressive Varying Coefficient Models with Application to Boston House Price Analysis

Simulation Analysis for Power of Bootstrap Moran Diagnostic Tests in Spatial Econometric Autoregressive Models

Spatial local M-estimation under association

A goodness-of-fit test for regression models with spatially correlated errors

A New Test for ARCH Effects and Its Finite-Sample Performance

Tests for time-varying coefficient spatial autoregressive panel data model with fixed effects