Abstract:Subpixel mapping (SPM) addresses the widespread mixed pixel problem in remote sensing images by predicting the spatial distribution of land cover within mixed pixels. However, conventional pixel-based spectral unmixing, a key pre-processing step for SPM, neglects valuable spatial contextual information and struggles with spectral variability, ultimately undermining SPM accuracy. Additionally, while extensively utilized, supervised spectral unmixing is labor-intensive and user-unfriendly. To address these issues, this paper proposes a fully automatic, unsupervised object-based SPM (UO-SPM) model that exploits object-scale information to reduce spectral unmixing errors and subsequently enhance SPM. Given that mixed pixels are typically located at the edges of objects (i.e., the inner part of objects is characterized by pure pixels), segmentation and morphological erosion are employed to identify pure pixels within objects and mixed pixels at the edges. More accurate endmembers are extracted from the identified pure pixels for the secondary spectral unmixing of the remaining mixed pixels. Experimental results on 10 study sites demonstrate that the proposed unsupervised object (UO)-based analysis is an effective model for enhancing both spectral unmixing and SPM. Specifically, the spectral unmixing results of UO show an average increase of 3.65 % and 1.09 % in correlation coefficient ( R ) compared to Fuzzy- C means (FCM) and linear spectral mixture model (LSMM)-derived coarse proportions, respectively. Moreover, the UO-derived results of four SPM methods (i.e., Hopfield neural network (HNN), Markov random field (MRF), pixel swapping (PSA) and radial basis function interpolation (RBF)) exhibit an average increase of 5.89 % and 3.04 % in overall accuracy (OA) across the four SPM methods and 10 study sites compared to the FCM and LSMM-based results, respectively. Moreover, the proportions of both mixed and pure pixels are more accurately predicted. The advantage of UO-SPM is more evident when the size of land cover objects is larger, benefiting from more accurate identification of objects.

Backtracking-Based Simultaneous Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for Sparse Unmixing of Hyperspectral Data

Blind Spectral Unmixing Based on Sparse Component Analysis for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery

Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization with Endmember Priori Strategy for Large-Scale Hyperspectral Sparse Unmixing

Nonlinear Hyperspectral Unmixing Based on Sparse Non-Negative Matrix Factorization

Correntropy-Based Spatial-Spectral Robust Sparsity-Regularized Hyperspectral Unmixing

Kernel Based Sparse NMF Algorithm for Hyperspectral Unmixing

Unsupervised Hyperspectral Unmixing Based on Constrained Nonnegative Matrix Factorization and Particle Swarm Optimization

Nonnegative-Matrix-Factorization-Based Hyperspectral Unmixing with Partially Known Endmembers

Adaptive $textit{L}_{bf 1/2}$ Sparsity-Constrained NMF With Half-Thresholding Algorithm for Hyperspectral Unmixing

Blind nonlinear hyperspectral unmixing based on constrained kernel nonnegative matrix factorization

Band Selection Based Hyperspectral Unmixing

Robust Multiscale Spectral–Spatial Regularized Sparse Unmixing for Hyperspectral Imagery

Spectral Unmixing Via Data-Guided Sparsity

Sparse Unmixing of Hyperspectral Data Using Spectral A Priori Information

Effective Spectral Unmixing via Robust Representation and Learning-based Sparsity.

Self-Dictionary Sparse Regression for Hyperspectral Unmixing: Greedy Pursuit and Pure Pixel Search are Related

Hyperspectral Unmixing Via Nonconvex Sparse and Low-Rank Constraint

A Two-Level Simultaneous Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Algorithm for Simultaneous Sparse Approximation Problems

A spatial-spectral clustering-based algorithm for endmember extraction and hyperspectral unmixing

Unsupervised object-based spectral unmixing for subpixel mapping

Distributed Unmixing of Hyperspectral Data With Sparsity Constraint