Abstract:Imaging spectrometers measure electromagnetic energy scattered in their instantaneous field view in hundreds or thousands of spectral channels with higher spectral resolution than multispectral cameras. Imaging spectrometers are therefore often referred to as hyperspectral cameras (HSCs). Higher spectral resolution enables material identification via spectroscopic analysis, which facilitates countless applications that require identifying materials in scenarios unsuitable for classical spectroscopic analysis. Due to low spatial resolution of HSCs, microscopic material mixing, and multiple scattering, spectra measured by HSCs are mixtures of spectra of materials in a scene. Thus, accurate estimation requires unmixing. Pixels are assumed to be mixtures of a few materials, called endmembers. Unmixing involves estimating all or some of: the number of endmembers, their spectral signatures, and their abundances at each pixel. Unmixing is a challenging, ill-posed inverse problem because of model inaccuracies, observation noise, environmental conditions, endmember variability, and data set size. Researchers have devised and investigated many models searching for robust, stable, tractable, and accurate unmixing algorithms. This paper presents an overview of unmixing methods from the time of Keshava and Mustard's unmixing tutorial [1] to the present. Mixing models are first discussed. Signal-subspace, geometrical, statistical, sparsity-based, and spatial-contextual unmixing algorithms are described. Mathematical problems and potential solutions are described. Algorithm characteristics are illustrated experimentally.

Band Selection Based Hyperspectral Unmixing

High-Efficiency Hyperspectral Unmixing Based on Band Selection

Blind Spectral Unmixing Based on Sparse Component Analysis for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery

Unsupervised Band Selection for Hyperspectral Imagery Classification Without Manual Band Removal.

Spectral and Spatial Complexity-Based Hyperspectral Unmixing

Blind Spectral Unmixing Considering the Adjacent Effect

Band Selection for Hyperspectral Imagery Using Affinity Propagation

Clustering-based Hyperspectral Band Selection Using Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization

Nonnegative-Matrix-Factorization-Based Hyperspectral Unmixing with Partially Known Endmembers

An Advanced Hyperspectral Band Selection Approach Based on Mutual Information.

A Complexity Constrained Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Unmixing

Hyperspectral Unmixing Via Projected Mini-Batch Gradient Descent

Kernel Based Sparse NMF Algorithm for Hyperspectral Unmixing

Spectral Mixture Model Inspired Network Architectures for Hyperspectral Unmixing

Correntropy-Based Spatial-Spectral Robust Sparsity-Regularized Hyperspectral Unmixing

Spectral–Spatial Robust Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Unmixing

Spectral and spatial character-based hyperspectral unmixing

Hypergraph-Regularized Sparse NMF for Hyperspectral Unmixing.

Unsupervised Hyperspectral Unmixing Based on Constrained Nonnegative Matrix Factorization and Particle Swarm Optimization

Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches

Hyperspectral Unmixing Network Accounting for Spectral Variability Based on a Modified Scaled and a Perturbed Linear Mixing Model