Does Allogeneic HSCT Play a Role in First-Line Post-Remission Therapy for AML Patients with T(8;21) in First Complete Remission?

H. -H. Zhu,X. -H. Zhang,H. Jiang,D. -H. Liu,H. Chen,Q. Jiang,L. -P. Xu,J. Lu,W. Han,L. Bao,Y. Wang,Y. -H. Chen,X. -J. Lu,J. -Z. Wang,F. -R. Wang,Y. -Z. Qin,Y-Y. Lai,R. -R. Liu,K. -Y. Liu,B. Jiang,X. -J. Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.12.315
2012-01-01
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Abstract:Whether allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can improve the outcome of high-risk relapse(HR) acute myeloid leukemia(AML) patients with t(8;21) in first complete remission (CR1) is still unknown. 76 patients with t(8;21)AML in CR1 were analyzed. Post-remission treatment included chemotherapy alone(n = 35) and allo-HSCT(n = 41). The minimal residual disease (MRD) was monitored using quantitative PCR to detect the RUNX1/RUNX1T1 transcript level. HR was defined as either a RUNX1/RUNX1T1 transcript level that was continuously higher than 0.1% or a transcript level that increased by more than one log unit within 6 months since CR; all other patients were defined as low-risk relapse (LR). A multivariate analysis of the total population revealed that the post-remission treatment choice (chemotherapy or allo-HSCT) and MRD status (LR or HR) were independent prognostic factors for relapse.Allo-HSCT decreased the relapse risk compared to chemotherapy (cumulative incidence of relapse, CIR, 20.0±6.9% vs. 57.3±9.2%; p = 0.0015), although neither the disease-free survival (DFS, 61.7±7.9% vs. 42.7±9.2%; p = 0.09) nor overall survival (OS, 68.0±7.8% vs. 52.5±11.0%; p = 0.40) were significantly different. For the MRD-LR patients, allo-HSCT did not improve outcome compared to chemotherapy (CIR, p = 0.07; DFS, p = 0.57; OS, p = 0.52). However, allo-HSCT significantly improved the outcome of HR patients compared to chemotherapy (CIR, 27.0±9.6% vs. 89.5±9.4%, p = 0.0003; DFS, 55.7±10.0% vs. 10.5±9.4%, p = 0.0099; OS, 67.8±9.4% vs. 14.2±12.1%, p = 0.046).HSCT can improve the outcome of HR patients with t(8;21) in CR1 and should be considered an option for first-line post-remission AML treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?