Abstract:Introduction: Measurable residual disease (MRD) detected by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) played a key role in monitoring therapeutic efficacy and predicting prognosis for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, identifying optimal assessing time points and incorporating MRD with other response criteria are inconclusive. Herein, based on our patient cohort data, we investigated the effect of early MRD on outcome of AML patients with different genetic-risk group and further evaluated its' impact on the allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) decision-making, which will help to establish an overall dynamic stratified prognosis system at the MRD level. Methods: Retrospective study was conducted in patients with newly diagnosed de novo AML (acute promyeloid leukemia exclude) in three clinical trials (ChiCTR-TRC-10001202 trial, ChiCTR-TRC-10001209 trial, and NCT03021330). Patients under age 60 who achieved morphological complete remission (CR) within two courses of chemotherapy were enrolled in our study. Any detectable MRD by LAIP and/or different-from-normal were reported as MFC-MRD positive. We firstly investigated the relapse and survival of patients with different MFC-MRD status after the first course (C1) or second course (C2). Then, the outcome of incorporate MRD status in AML patients with different genetic-risk classification were evaluated. And the outcome of Allo-HSCT during the first CR and its association with the MRD status were also analyzed. Result: The pooled analysis included 769 patients, with a median age of 38 (range 14 to 60). According to ELN 2017 recommendation, 427 (55.5%), 230 (29.9%), and 112 (14.6%) patients were classified as favorable (FR), intermediate (IR), and adverse (AR) risk groups, respectively. By evaluating relapse and survival based on MRD status, MRD positivity after C1 and C2 were both associated with significantly higher 3-year CIR (C1: 44.6% MRD+ vs. 28.3% MRD-, P < 0.001; C2 53.5% MRD+ vs. 31.0% MRD-, P < 0.001), poor RFS (47.0% vs. 66.9%, P < 0.001; 41.0% vs. 63.0%, P < 0.001) and OS (52.5% vs. 78.6%, P < 0.001; 48.0% vs. 75.6%, P < 0.001). Hierarchical analysis revealed that after C1, MRD positivity related to significantly worse prognosis in each risk group. In FR group, CRMRD+ patients exhibited higher relapse rate compared to CRMRD- patients (3-year CIR, 34.5% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.077), as well as worse survival (3-year OS, 71.0% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.007). Similarly, in IR group, 3-year CIR was 47.2% in CRMRD+ compared to 36.0% in CRMRD- (P = 0.009), along with a worse 3-year OS (47.8% vs. 72.9%, P < 0.001). And the trend remained consistent in the AR group (CIR, 62.6% CRMRD+ vs. 37.1% CRMRD-, P = 0.026; OS, 21.2% vs. 55.5%, P = 0.002). This disadvantage became more apparent after C2, especially in FR (CIR, 40.7% CRMRD+ vs. 25.2% CRMRD-, P = 0.019; OS, 57.6% vs. 84.0%, P < 0.001) and IR (CIR, 61.5% vs. 35.2%, P < 0.001; OS, 44.2% vs. 70.7%, P < 0.001). 223 patients received Allo-HSCT during their CR1, 89 (39.9%), 81 (36.3%), and 53 (23.8%) patients were from FR, IR, and AR groups, respectively. Through landmark analysis and time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression, we demonstrated that the outcome of patients with CRMRD+, particularly in FR and IR groups, was significantly improved by means of Allo-HSCT. In FR group after C2, OS of CRMRD+ patients was prolonged by Allo-HSCT during CR1 (HR, 0.383, [0.201~0.731], P = 0.004) (Figure B). In IR group, the OS of CRMRD+ patients after C1 were improved after allo-HSCT (HR, 0.529, [0.329~0.849], P = 0.008) (Figure A). Similar trend was also witnessed after C2 (HR, 0.467, [0.277~0.786], P = 0.004) (Figure B). However, OS of CRMRD- patients in FR and IR group were comparable between transplant and non-transplant patients. In AR group, regardless of MRD status, all patients could be benefited from allo-HSCT. Conclusion: Early MRD clearance exhibited great prognostic significance, especially for patients in the favorable and intermediate risk group. Meanwhile, MRD positivity after C1 and C2 could early identify patients who need CR1 allo-HSCT in the intermediate risk group. And for patients in the favorable risk group, the evaluation time for Allo-HSCT decision-making should be after C2. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Impact of measurable residual disease in combination with CD19 on postremission therapy choices for adult t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission

The Impact of CD19 Expression Combined with Measurable Residual Disease on Post-Remission Treatment and Outcome in Adult t(8;21) Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Minimal residual disease level determined by flow cytometry provides reliable risk stratification in adults with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Chemotherapy with the Use of Next‐generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Based on Measurable Residual Disease Has the Potential to Avoid Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Treatment for Adults with Philadelphia Chromosome–positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Association Between Measurable Residual Disease in Patients with Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and First Remission, Treatment, and Outcomes.

Dynamic assessment of measurable residual disease in favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first remission, treatment, and outcomes

Prognostic Effect and Clinical Application of Early Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) By Flow Cytometry on De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Mrd-Directed Risk Stratification Treatment May Improve Outcomes Of T(8;21) Aml In The First Complete Remission: Results From The Aml05 Multicenter Trial

Does Allogeneic HSCT Play a Role in First-Line Post-Remission Therapy for AML Patients with T(8;21) in First Complete Remission?

Minimal Residual Disease At First Achievement Of Complete Remission Predicts Outcome In Adult Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The effect of the detection of minimal residual disease for the prognosis and the choice of post-remission therapy of intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia without FLT3-ITD, NPM1 and biallelic CEBPA mutations

Minimal Residual Disease-guided Risk Restratification and Therapy Improves the Survival of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Experience from a Tertiary Children's Hospital in China

Impact of Measurable Residual Disease Clearance Kinetics in Patients with AML Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy

Risk stratification in the clinical application of minimal residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia

Risk factors for post-transplant relapse and survival in younger adult patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A multicenter retrospective study

Risk-Stratification Treatment Directed By Minimal Residual Disease Improves The Outcome Of Acute Myeloid Leukemia With T(8;21) In First Complete Remission: Results Of The Aml05 Multicentre Trial

[Effect of Flow Cytometric MRD Detection at Different Time Points during AML Chemotherapy on Prognosis]

Detection Of Measurable Residual Disease May Better Predict The Outcome Rather Than Mutations Based On Next Generation Sequencing In Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Biallelic Mutations Of Cebpa

Flow cytometry-based measurable residual disease (MRD) analysis identifies AML patients who may benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring By Quantitative RT-PCR In t (8; 21) AML Early After Allogeneic HSCT Can Predict Clinical Outcomes and Allow Further Risk Stratification

Measurable residual disease assessment prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: a 20-year monocentric study