Abstract:Procurement and outsourcing are two important topics for many firms.An increased number of companies outsource some of their internal functions to the third party in order to focus on their core competencies and improve their competitive advantage in the market.The popularity of outsourcing is growing,as both successes and failures have been observed in practice.It remains unclear about how the outsourcing decision influences each party's behavior and strategic decisions under different procurement mechanisms. In this paper we model a supply chain system in which a manufacturer purchases multiple components.For each component,there are multiple suppliers capable of providing it.The manufacturer considers outsourcing the procurement of all components to one of his suppliers,rather than purchasing them by himself.Since the production costs are not publicly known,auctions are used to reward the contract.In the first stage,the manufacturer uses the first-price sealed-bid reverse auction to determine which supplier wins the outsourcing contract.Then,the winner of the first auction produces the component that the company is able to provide,and uses reverse auctions to procure the required components from the subset of the suppliers in the first auction. We analyze a supplier's bidding strategies in both stages.In the second period the supplier's bidding strategy is independent of the publicly announced winning price in the first stage.The boundary conditions and differential equations are used to help formulate the supplier's bidding strategies in the first period.The supplier's first-period bidding price for the whole package can be decomposed into expected costs associated with all components.We also compare a manufacturer's total procurement cost when a manufacturer purchases components by itself versus when integral procurement is auctioned.The result shows that the total expected procurement costs are identical under both mechanisms.Furthermore,an explicit solution of bidding strategies for all suppliers can be derived for a special case,where the supplier's cost distributions are uniform.We also provide a numerical example to illustrate the supplier's bidding behavior. These results provide managerial insights for the managers.We show that although outsourcing integral procurement increases the complexity of the bidding strategy for the suppliers,it does not increase the manufacturer's total expected procurement cost.However,the outsourcing strategy can help the manufacturer focus on its core competency.

Bundling Decisions in Procurement Auctions with Sequential Tasks

Combinatorial Auction Algorithm for Project Portfolio Selection and Scheduling to Maximize the Net Present Value

Bidding and renegotiation in procurement auctions

Bidding Strategies Analysis for Procurement Combinatorial Auctions.

A Comparison of a Simple Procurement Auction and Generalized Nash Bargaining

Ascending Price Combinatorial Auction with Multiple Activity Levels

Simultaneous Vs. Sequential Sales: Bidder Competition and Supply Uncertainty

Strategic behavior in dynamic auctions

Strategic And Welfare Implications Of Product Bundling Under Bertrand Competition

A Two-stage Equilibrium Bidding Strategy in Outsourcing Procurement of Multiple Components

Auctioning Supply Contracts

Performance Bundling in Multi-dimensional Competitions

Coordinated Dynamic Bidding in Repeated Second-Price Auctions with Budgets

An Optimal Multi-Unit Combinatorial Procurement Auction with Single Minded Bidders

Scheduling with package auctions

A Public Procurement Combinatorial Auction Mechanism with Quality Assignment

Capacity Games with Supply Function Competition

Simultaneous Vs. Sequential Auctions, Intensity of Competition and Uncertainty

A Study of First-price Sealed-bid Procurement Auctions for Divisible Items

Vickrey Auctions with Sequential and Costly Participation

Job Design with Sequential Tasks and Outcome Externalities Revisited