Abstract:The evolution of cooperation has been a perennial problem in evolutionary biology because cooperation can be undermined by selfish cheaters who gain an advantage in the short run, while compromising the long-term viability of the population. Evolutionary game theory has shown that under certain conditions, cooperation nonetheless evolves stably, for example if players have the opportunity to punish cheaters that benefit from a public good yet refuse to pay into the common pool. However, punishment has remained enigmatic because it is costly and difficult to maintain. On the other hand, cooperation emerges naturally in the public goods game if the synergy of the public good (the factor multiplying the public good investment) is sufficiently high. In terms of this synergy parameter, the transition from defection to cooperation can be viewed as a phase transition with the synergy as the critical parameter. We show here that punishment reduces the critical value at which cooperation occurs, but also creates the possibility of meta-stable phase transitions, where populations can 'tunnel' into the cooperating phase below the critical value. At the same time, cooperating populations are unstable even above the critical value, because a group of defectors that are large enough can 'nucleate' such a transition. We study the mean-field theoretical predictions via agent-based simulations of finite populations using an evolutionary approach where the decisions to cooperate or to punish are encoded genetically in terms of evolvable probabilities. We recover the theoretical predictions and demonstrate that the population shows hysteresis, as expected in systems that exhibit super-heating and super-cooling. We conclude that punishment can stabilize populations of cooperators below the critical point, but it is a two-edged sword: it can also stabilize defectors above the critical point.

Cooperative behavior in N-person evolutionary snowdrift games with punishment

Costly Punishment and Cooperation in the Evolutionary Snowdrift Game

Cooperation in the two-population snowdrift game with punishment enforced through different mechanisms

Cooperative Behavior in a Model of Evolutionary Snowdrift Games with N-person Interactions

Evolution of cooperation in well-mixed N-person snowdrift games

Evolutionary dynamics of N -person snowdrift game with two thresholds in well-mixed and structured populations

The evolution of cooperation in voluntary public goods game with shared-punishment

Selfish punishment with avoiding mechanism can alleviate both first-order and second-order social dilemma

Three-strategy N-person Snowdrift Game Incorporating Loners

The role of punishment in the spatial public goods game

Evolution of cooperation in a three-strategy game combining snowdrift and stag hunt games

Enhanced cooperation and harmonious population in an evolutionary N-person snowdrift game

Facilitating the evolution of cooperation through altruistic punishment with adaptive feedback

Evolutionary game dynamics of cooperation in prisoner's dilemma with time delay.

Defector-accelerated cooperativeness and punishment in public goods games with mutations

Competition and cooperation among different punishing strategies in the spatial public goods game

Effects of punishment driven by inequity aversion on promoting cooperation in public goods games

Effectiveness of conditional punishment for the evolution of public cooperation

Peer pressure: enhancement of cooperation through mutual punishment

Evolutionary Snowdrift Game with Loners

Punishment in public goods games leads to meta-stable phase transitions and hysteresis