Abstract:The evolution of cooperation has been a perennial problem in evolutionary biology because cooperation can be undermined by selfish cheaters who gain an advantage in the short run, while compromising the long-term viability of the population. Evolutionary game theory has shown that under certain conditions, cooperation nonetheless evolves stably, for example if players have the opportunity to punish cheaters that benefit from a public good yet refuse to pay into the common pool. However, punishment has remained enigmatic because it is costly and difficult to maintain. On the other hand, cooperation emerges naturally in the public goods game if the synergy of the public good (the factor multiplying the public good investment) is sufficiently high. In terms of this synergy parameter, the transition from defection to cooperation can be viewed as a phase transition with the synergy as the critical parameter. We show here that punishment reduces the critical value at which cooperation occurs, but also creates the possibility of meta-stable phase transitions, where populations can 'tunnel' into the cooperating phase below the critical value. At the same time, cooperating populations are unstable even above the critical value, because a group of defectors that are large enough can 'nucleate' such a transition. We study the mean-field theoretical predictions via agent-based simulations of finite populations using an evolutionary approach where the decisions to cooperate or to punish are encoded genetically in terms of evolvable probabilities. We recover the theoretical predictions and demonstrate that the population shows hysteresis, as expected in systems that exhibit super-heating and super-cooling. We conclude that punishment can stabilize populations of cooperators below the critical point, but it is a two-edged sword: it can also stabilize defectors above the critical point.

Cooperation in the two-population snowdrift game with punishment enforced through different mechanisms

Cooperative behavior in N-person evolutionary snowdrift games with punishment

The evolution of cooperation in voluntary public goods game with shared-punishment

Costly Punishment and Cooperation in the Evolutionary Snowdrift Game

Competition and cooperation among different punishing strategies in the spatial public goods game

Effects of punishment driven by inequity aversion on promoting cooperation in public goods games

Evolution of cooperation in a three-strategy game combining snowdrift and stag hunt games

Structured populations facilitate cooperation in policed Public Goods Games

Defector-accelerated cooperativeness and punishment in public goods games with mutations

Facilitating the evolution of cooperation through altruistic punishment with adaptive feedback

Selfish punishment with avoiding mechanism can alleviate both first-order and second-order social dilemma

Punishment in public goods games leads to meta-stable phase transitions and hysteresis

Effectiveness of conditional punishment for the evolution of public cooperation

Competition of individual and institutional punishments in spatial public goods games

Evolutionary dynamics in the public goods games with switching between punishment and exclusion

The Influence of Fine Distribution and Compensation on Cooperation in Public Goods Game

Punish, but not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game

Symbiotic behaviour in the public goods game with altruistic punishment

If Cooperation is Likely Punish Mildly: Insights from Economic Experiments Based on the Snowdrift Game.

Cooperation dynamics in spatial public goods games with graded punishment mechanism

The role of punishment in the spatial public goods game