Development of the Angina Patient Self-Management Questionnaire

L. Yu,H. Y. Zhang,C. H. Yu,M. Chen,G. L. Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.245

IF: 5.156

2013-01-01

Value in Health

Abstract:Guidelines had present many management recommendations to physicians on angina prevention and treatment. However patients still knew less about angina management in China. They need Heart education. Thus, we want to develop an angina patient self-management questionnaire (ASMQ). We hypothesized the questionnaire should carry messages of risk factors, prevention and treatment of angina. Items were determined from guidelines, and interview of patients and cardiovascular doctors. A five point Likert scale was chosed as the response format. Higher score means better management. The questionnaire was tested along with a cross-sectional angina study. Reliability was evaluated via internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Construct validity was tested through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and discriminant validity was assessed by detecting differences between in-patients and out-patients. We assumed in-patients learn more about angina than out-patients. The ASMQ contained 12 items organized in two domains: risk-factor and self-management. The ASMQ was tested on 430 patients (age 63±12 year; 171 male, 40%); Of those, 150 (35%) were outpatients, and 86 (20%) retested 24 hours later. Test-rest correlation coefficient of the ASMQ was 0.740, and 0.719, 0.780 for risk-factor and self-management domains respectively. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.616 of the overall questionnaire, and 0.692 of the self-management domain. But the risk-factor domain was 0.432, showed an unsatisfied internal consistency. Three factors were extracted through EFA, and were stratified into 2 domains as expected. The score of in-patients (43±7) was higher than out-patients(41±6), which showed a better management among in-patients (p=0.017). The ASMQ showed an acceptable reliability and good validity, which could be used to assess angina self-management, and also recommended to be used as an outcome along with quality of life to assess clinical efficacy. The risk-factor domain would be modified in the further study.