Evaluation of the Burden of Illness of Skin Cancer among Veteran Patients United States

L. Wang,A. H. Dysinger,L. Xie,J. Du,A. Huang,O. Baser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.403
IF: 5.156
2013-01-01
Value in Health
Abstract:To evaluate the burden of skin cancer among U.S. veteran patients. Patients diagnosed with skin cancer were identified (International Classification of Disease 9th Revision Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] diagnosis code 232.xx) using the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Medical SAS datasets from October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2011. The first diagnosis date was defined as the index date. A comparison group of patients without skin cancer of the same age, region, gender and index year were identified and matched on baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index with a randomly chosen index date to minimize selection bias. Patients in both groups were required to be at least 18 years old and have 1 year continuous health plan enrollment pre- and post-index date. Follow-up health care costs and utilizations were compared between the two groups after using 1:1 propensity score matching adjusting baseline characteristics. A total of 12,504 patients were identified for the skin cancer and comparison cohorts. After 1:1 propensity score matching, each group included 4,400 patients with well-balanced baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Patients diagnosed with skin cancer had higher percentages of inpatient (5.75% vs. 2.64%, p<0.01), emergency room (11.89% vs. 6.50%, p<0.01), physician office (99.95% vs. 66.70%, p<0.01), outpatient (99.95% vs. 67.41%, p<0.01), and pharmacy visits (91.89% vs. 71.30%, p<0.01). Patients in the skin cancer cohort also incurred higher expenditures in inpatient ($1,494 vs. $555, p<0.01), emergency room ($108 vs. $60, p<0.01), physician office ($4,486 vs. $1,480, p<0.01), outpatient ($4,780 vs. $1,639) and pharmacy visits ($707 vs. $429, p<0.01) than patients in the comparison group. Study results suggest that cancer patients diagnosed with skin cancer incurred significantly higher costs and health care resources compared to patients without.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?