303 Health Maintenance Practices Associated with Incident Skin Cancer in US Women and Men

E. Cho,A. Drucker,W. Li,D. Savitz,M. A. Weinstock,A. A. Qureshi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2018.03.309
IF: 7.59
2018-01-01
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Abstract:Detection bias is an important source of potential bias in epidemiologic studies in which more intensive surveillance is associated with a greater apparent risk of disease. To assess the potential for detection bias related to skin cancers, we examined the association between various health maintenance practices and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and melanoma in Nurses Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS), large US cohorts of women and men, respectively. Participants in the cohorts are periodically asked about healthcare screening practices: physical examination by a physician, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, eye examination, serum cholesterol, mammogram, breast examination and pelvic examination, prostate-specific antigen test and rectal examination. They are also asked whether they have been diagnosed with skin cancer. For SCC and melanoma, incident cases are confirmed by pathology review. We followed the participants from 1990 to 2012 and used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in each study then pool the study-specific results using random effects models for the association between health maintenance practices and skin cancer risk. Physical examination was associated with SCC (1.34, 1.00-1.80) and BCC (1.28, 1.16-1.40) but not with melanoma (1.01, 0.69-1.49). Other health maintenance practices were generally associated with both SCC and BCC. Our results demonstrate potential detection bias in epidemiologic studies of skin cancer, which future studies should take into consideration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?