Abstract:The spatial and temporal variations in terrestrial carbon storage play a pivotal role in regulating future climate change. However, Earth system models (ESMs), which have coupled the terrestrial biosphere and atmosphere, show great uncertainty in simulating the global land carbon storage. Here, based on multiple global datasets and a traceability analysis, we diagnosed the uncertainty source of terrestrial carbon storage in 22 ESMs that participated in phases 5 and 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5 and CMIP6). The modeled global terrestrial carbon storage has converged among ESMs from CMIP5 (1936.9 ± 739.3 PgC) to CMIP6 (1774.4 ± 439.0 PgC) but is persistently lower than the observation-based estimates (2285 ± 669 PgC). By further decomposing terrestrial carbon storage into net primary production (NPP) and ecosystem carbon residence time ( τ E ), we found that the decreased intermodel spread in land carbon storage primarily resulted from more accurate simulations on NPP among ESMs from CMIP5 to CMIP6. The persistent underestimation of land carbon storage was caused by the biased τ E . In CMIP5 and CMIP6, the modeled τ E was far shorter than the observation-based estimates. The potential reasons for the biased τ E could be the lack of or incomplete representation of nutrient limitation, vertical soil biogeochemistry, and the permafrost carbon cycle. Moreover, the modeled τ E became the key driver for the intermodel spread in global land carbon storage in CMIP6. Overall, our study indicates that CMIP6 models have greatly improved the terrestrial carbon cycle, with a decreased model spread in global terrestrial carbon storage and less uncertain productivity. However, more efforts are needed to understand and reduce the persistent data–model disagreement on carbon storage and residence time in the terrestrial biosphere. The spatial and temporal variations in terrestrial carbon storage play a pivotal role in regulating future climate change. However, Earth system models (ESMs), which have coupled the terrestrial biosphere and atmosphere, show great uncertainty in simulating the global land carbon storage. Here, based on multiple global datasets and a traceability analysis, we diagnosed the uncertainty source of terrestrial carbon storage in 22 ESMs that participated in phases 5 and 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5 and CMIP6). The modeled global terrestrial carbon storage has converged among ESMs from CMIP5 (1936.9 ± 739.3 PgC) to CMIP6 (1774.4 ± 439.0 PgC) but is persistently lower than the observation-based estimates (2285 ± 669 PgC). By further decomposing terrestrial carbon storage into net primary production (NPP) and ecosystem carbon residence time ( τ E ), we found that the decreased intermodel spread in land carbon storage primarily resulted from more accurate simulations on NPP among ESMs from CMIP5 to CMIP6. The persistent underestimation of land carbon storage was caused by the biased τ E . In CMIP5 and CMIP6, the modeled τ E was far shorter than the observation-based estimates. The potential reasons for the biased τ E could be the lack of or incomplete representation of nutrient limitation, vertical soil biogeochemistry, and the permafrost carbon cycle. Moreover, the modeled τ E became the key driver for the intermodel spread in global land carbon storage in CMIP6. Overall, our study indicates that CMIP6 models have greatly improved the terrestrial carbon cycle, with a decreased model spread in global terrestrial carbon storage and less uncertain productivity. However, more efforts are needed to understand and reduce the persistent data–model disagreement on carbon storage and residence time in the terrestrial biosphere.

Uncertainties in Carbon Residence Time and Npp-Driven Carbon Uptake in Terrestrial Ecosystems of the Conterminous Usa: A Bayesian Approach

Quantifying Uncertainties From Additional Nitrogen Data And Processes In A Terrestrial Ecosystem Model With Bayesian Probabilistic Inversion

Variations of Carbon Allocation and Turnover Time Across Tropical Forests

Multiscale assessment of North American terrestrial carbon balance

Evaluating Land Cover Influences on Model Uncertainties-A Case Study of Cropland Carbon Dynamics in the Mid-Continent Intensive Campaign Region

Evolution of Uncertainty in Terrestrial Carbon Storage in Earth System Models from CMIP5 to CMIP6

Uncertainty propagation in a global biogeochemical model driven by leaf area data

Application of the Ecosystem Model and Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Parameter Estimation and Productivity Prediction

Joint CO2 Mole Fraction and Flux Analysis Confirms Missing Processes in CASA Terrestrial Carbon Uptake over North America

Uncertainty Analysis in Data Processing on the Estimation of Net Carbon Exchanges at Different Forest Ecosystems in China

North American Carbon Program (NACP) Regional Interim Synthesis: Terrestrial Biospheric Model Intercomparison

Modeling and Uncertainty Analysis of Carbon and Water Fluxes in a Broad-Leaved Korean Pine Mixed Forest Based on Model-Data Fusion

Spatially Asynchronous Changes in Strength and Stability of Terrestrial Net Ecosystem Productivity

Sources of variation in simulated ecosystem carbon storage capacity from the 5th Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)

Critical land change information enhances the understanding of carbon balance in the United States

Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions.

Constraining biospheric carbon dioxide fluxes by combined top-down and bottom-up approaches

Spatial patterns of ecosystem carbon residence time in Chinese forests

Reconciling carbon‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales

Sources of Uncertainty in Modeled Land Carbon Storage Within and Across Three MIPs: Diagnosis with Three New Techniques

Largely underestimated carbon emission from land use and land cover change in the conterminous United States