Comparison Study on the Sorption Properties of Silica Gel- and Activated Carbon-Licl Composite Sorbents
YU Nan,WANG RuZhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/n972014-01263
2015-01-01
Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)
Abstract:The development of solid sorption refrigeration and sorption thermal storage technologies largely depends on the performance of sorbents.Compared with conventional water sorbents, such as silica gel, inorganic salts, such as LiCl, show great water sorption capacity.However, LiCl, a type of hygroscopic salt, is likely to liquefy upon contact with water vapor.A possible solution to this problem is to use porous matrices that can incorporate LiCl.The large internal pore volume of the matrix can contain excess LiCl solution, whereas the large specific surface area can enhance sorption kinetics.To find a suitable host matrix for LiCl, two types of host matrices, namely, silica gel and activated carbon, were examined.The prepared silica gel-LiCl and activated carbon-LiCl composite sorbents were denoted as SLi40 and ALi40, respectively.SLi40 was prepared under ambient pressure, whereas ALi40 required preparation under vacuum conditions.The pore size distributions of the samples were measured on an ASAP2020 gas adsorption analyzer.The pore volume of SLi40 was larger than that of ALi40.A comparative study on the sorption properties of the composites was performed to assess the effect of the matrix on the water sorption properties of LiCl.The sorption properties of the two composites were tested in a closed thermogravimetric balance.Sorption platforms were observed for the activated carbon-LiCl composite under the pressures studied, indicating the occurrence of hydration reactions between anhydrous LiCl and water vapor, generating LiCl monohydrate as the reaction product.A plateau was not observed at higher pressures (i.e., 1660 Pa), indicating that LiCl•H 2 O was unstable at high pressures.In contrast, sorption platforms were not observed for SLi40, indicating that interactions between silica gel and LiCl may have modified the water sorption characteristic of LiCl.At a sorption temperature of 30 °C, the water uptake of ALi40 reached 0.97 g/g, which was considerably higher than that of SLi40 (0.74 g/g).This result indicates that activated carbon is a better choice of matrix than silica gel.Overall, comparison of the water uptake results shows that activated carbon plays a positive role toward the water sorption of LiCl owing to its hydrophobicity, whereas silica gel influences the water sorption property of LiCl to some extent.sorption, matrix, lithium chloride, silica gel, activated carbon