On the Application of the Priestley–Taylor Relation on Sub-daily Time Scales

Xiaofeng Guo,Heping Liu,Kun Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0031-y

2015-01-01

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

Abstract:Based on observations over a reservoir and a glacier, we investigate the sub-daily variations in the Priestley–Taylor parameter \(\alpha \) for saturated surfaces. According to the sign of the eddy-covariance fluxes of sensible heat \((H)\) and latent heat \((LE)\) (positive and negative for upward and downward transfer, respectively), measurements are organized into three heat-flux regimes. In regimes I \((H>0;\, LE>0)\) and II \((H<0;\, LE>0)\) over the water, 30-min retrievals of \(\alpha \) vary within the ranges of 1.00–1.32 and 1.24–2.04, respectively, and over glacial ice/snow surfaces, \(\alpha \) appears more variable: \(\alpha <-0.10\) and \(\alpha >1.70\) in regime II, and \(0.08<\alpha <1.0\) in regime III \((H<0;\, LE<0)\). Such variations in \(\alpha \) have practical implications for the application of the Priestley–Taylor relation on a sub-daily time scale. When adopted for estimating latent heat fluxes over this reservoir, the rule-of-thumb \(\alpha \) value of 1.26 leads to overestimates and underestimates in regimes I and II, respectively. Moreover, despite adopting locally calibrated \(\alpha \) values over the ice/snow surfaces, the Priestley–Taylor relation is found to produce significant errors in both regimes II and III, and thus is considered largely inapplicable for reliable estimations of sublimation and deposition.