Replication of the Global BPgen Consortium Genome-Wide Association Study on Essential Hypertension in East Asians

Bo Xi,Yue Shen,Jie Mi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.08.604
IF: 4.039
2011-01-01
International Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:Objective: The recent genome wide association study identified eight hypertension susceptibility loci in Europeans. Subsequently, several studies have investigated these associations among East Asian populations. However, the results were inconsistent. In this study, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the association of five most studied polymorphisms, including CSK rs1378942, CYP17A1 rs11191548, MTHFR rs17367504, FGF5 rs16998073, ZNF652 rs16948048, with hypertension risk. Methods: Published literature from PubMed, ISI web of science and EMBASE databases were retrieved. All studies evaluating the associations between five polymorphisms and hypertension risk in East Asians were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using fixed- or random-effects model. Results: Six studies (14,676 cases/18,539 controls) for CSK rs1378942 polymorphism, six studies (13,996 cases/17,616 controls) for CYP17A1 rs11191548 polymorphism, four studies (7994 cases/12,844 controls) for MTHFR rs17367504 polymorphism, three studies (6026 cases/8393 controls) for FGF5 rs16998073 polymorphism, and three studies (4297 cases/5561 controls) for ZNF652 rs16948048 polymorphism were included in the meta-analysis. The results suggested that both CYP17A1 rs11191548 and FGF5 rs16998073 polymorphisms were significantly associated with hypertension risk in East Asians (CYP17A1 rs11191548: OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.14–1.24, P=0.000; FGF5 rs16998073: OR=1.30, 95% CI 1.23–1.37, P=0.000); whereas no significant associations were observed for CSK rs1378942 (OR=1.10, 95% CI 0.97–1.25, P=0.141), MTHFR rs17367504 (OR=1.06, 95% CI 0.98–1.14, P=0.126) or ZNF652 rs16948048 polymorphism (OR=0.95, 95% CI 0.80–1.13, P=0.566). Conclusion: The present meta-analysis indicated the significant associations of both CYP17A1 and FGF5 genes with hypertension susceptibility in East Asians.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?