Controlling Electromagnetic Waves with Meta-Surfaces
Qiong He,Shiyi Xiao,Xin Li,Che Qu,Qin Xu,Shulin Sun,Lei Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/2.1201402.005337
2014-01-01
SPIE Newsroom
Abstract:Manipulation of electromagnetic (EM) waves (e.g., for antireflection, light absorption, and imaging applications) has long been restricted by the limited range of EM parameters exhibited by natural materials. Metamaterials (MTMs)—artificial materials composed of subwavelength functional EM microstructures arranged in specific macroscopic ’orders’—can be designed so that they exhibit specific values of permittivity and permeability. They therefore offer significantly more opportunities to control EM waves than with traditional materials. Artificial microstructures—or ’meta-atoms’—had an important role in the early development of MTMs, but with the advent of transformation optics (TO) theory, new ways to manipulate EM waves have emerged. The importance of MTM macroscopic orders has also now become recognized and has expanded wave manipulation abilities.1 Despite the progress that has been made using TO theory to manipulate EM waves, the designs require that MTMs exhibit anisotropic and extreme parameters, which can limit their practical realizations. Recently, a class of ultra-thin MTMs (meta-surfaces), with planar meta-atoms that possess distinct EM responses arranged in specific orders, has attracted substantial attention.2–10 It has been found that a v-shaped antenna array can support anomalous reflection/refraction of impinging light, which cannot be described by the classical Snell’s law (relationship between angles of incidence and reflection/refraction at a planar interface). Instead a new generalized formulation of Snell’s law is required, which provides a better understanding of the reflection/refraction physics involved and increases the ability to control EM waves.2, 3 Surface waves (SWs)—also known as surface plasmon polaritons—have very short wavelengths and strong local fields. They can therefore be useful in subwavelength imaging and light harvesting, and have many optical applications. Conventional methods of exciting SWs with propagating waves (PWs) use prism or grating couplers, but these are inefficient. Figure 1. (a) Geometry of a gradient meta-surface unit cell. (b) Part of a fabricated (1.14-gradient) meta-surface sample. Modeled and finitedifference-time-domain (FDTD) simulated reflection phase ( ̊ ) distributions for three different meta-surfaces are shown in (c), (e), and (g). Measured (EXP-FF) and simulated (FDTD) scattering patterns are shown in (d), (f), and (h). : Reflection phase profile gradient. k0: Wave vector in vacuum. (Reprinted with permission.4)