Agronomic Improvements in Corn by Alternating Nitrogen and Irrigation to Various Plant Densities

Kun Han,Chunju Zhou,Haiyan Sheng,Yang,Liang Zhang,Linquan Wang,Guoqing Chen,Zengjia Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0335
IF: 2.65
2015-01-01
Agronomy Journal
Abstract:Increasing water and N use efficiency and lowering environmental pollution are primary concerns for both agricultural production and environmental quality in northwestern China. A 2‐yr field experiment was conducted to assess and model the effects of irrigation, N, and plant density on maize (Zea mays L.) when N fertilizer and irrigation were separated in an alternating furrow irrigation system. Regression modeling (a ternary quadratic equation) showed that N fertilization positively affected yield, water use efficiency, N uptake, soil NO3–N, and NH3 volatilization. Irrigation improved yield, N uptake, and increased soil NO3–N in the deeper soil layer (0.6–2.0 m) but reduced water use efficiency, NH3 volatilization, and soil NO3–N in the 0‐ to 0.6‐m soil layer. Planting density positively affected yield, water use efficiency, and N uptake but negatively influenced NH3 volatilization and soil NO3–N. The combination of 255 kg N ha−1 N fertilizer, 100 mm of irrigation water, and 59,467 plants ha−1 in 2010 and 245 kg N ha−1 N fertilizer, 98 mm of irrigation water, and 58,376 plants ha−1 in 2011 resulted in maximum income for maize yield (7245 kg ha−1 in 2010 and 6972 kg ha−1 in 2011). However, environmental and agronomic objectives did not match. Specifically, the combination of N, irrigation rate, and plant density with maximum yield increased N leaching and NH3 losses, whereas the combination lowering environmental pollution due to N losses caused a reduction in yield. Therefore, the trade‐off in management of N, irrigation, and planting density was emphasized for both environmental and agronomic benefits in our study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?