Book Review: Sigurd D’Hondt, Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (eds), the Pragmatics of Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2009. Xii + 262 Pp., US$50 (Pbk/e-Book)

Ci-hua Xu,Zhen-qiang Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813100040040603

2010-01-01

Discourse & Communication

Abstract:strategy to perform masculinity or femininity depending on the goals they want to achieve (e.g. Semino and Koller). In this regard, this volume represents a beginning – it opens a conversation on the complex interplay between gender and metaphor in political language. As far as methodology is concerned, this volume can be regarded as a good example of how to adopt a corpus-based approach in research on conceptual metaphor. All of the contributors in this volume base their hypotheses, assumptions and suggestions on the corpora they have designed and compiled for the purpose of the study. However, they may differ at a more specific level in how they make use of these corpora. Some researchers conduct a careful examination of the metaphorical expressions realizing a conceptual metaphor, whereas others look at the lexemes associated with a conceptual domain or the femininity of a particular metaphor theme. Another point to note is that most of the studies in this volume combine quantitative corpus-based investigations with qualitative text analysis. Such an integrated analysis allows the reader to discern the characteristics of metaphor use at the individual level. In also enables us to obtain an in-depth view of the data by studying metaphor in the context of other linguistic features such as modality, intertextuality, negation, etc. As a whole, this volume is a welcome contribution to the study of gender and metaphor use, and more generally, to the study of metaphor in discourse. This volume will interest students and researchers with academic backgrounds as diverse as in discourse analysis, gender studies, conceptual metaphor, political communication and media studies.