Book Review: Ourania Hatzidaki and Dionysis Goutsos (eds), Greece in Crisis: Combining Critical Discourse and Corpus Linguistics Perspectives

Jianxin Yang,Yaqi Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520982497b

2021-01-01

Abstract:Multi-Dimensional Analysis in writing and speaking tests in order to re-evaluate, revise and even refine the representation of constructs of language in the rubric. Gablasova investigates word acquisition from academic reading in first and second language by two groups of students, which shows the students tend to trigger more superordinate words and high-frequency words during vocabulary acquisition. Egbert and Davis study the semantic relationships in Noun + Noun sequences and their diachronic changes in the Corpus of Historical American English to show methods for addressing historical change. Chapter 8–10 move to triangulate corpus methods with psycholinguistics. Hughes and Hardie explore collocation by combining corpus data with experimental work, showing that there is a neurophysiological difference in the way that the brain processes collocational bigrams versus non-collocational ones. Gries examines the dative alternation between ditransitives and to-datives and structural priming effects on learners’ choices of verb construction. Ellis investigates the processing of abstract verb-argument constructions and verb-preposition collocations in an experiment. The results suggest that a combination of corpus linguistics and psycholinguistics increases ecological validity. In the last chapter, the editors conclude by describing the benefits and drawbacks of triangulation and explore the degree to which the triangulation was successful in these nine individual studies. Triangulation helps the researchers establish the ecological validity of constructs or findings, and complement and benefit from interor crossdisciplinarity so that the limitation of any single approach can be significantly reduced. However, it can be a challenge to establish and justify the relationship among the wider range of concepts involved in triangulating approaches, and contradictions in results might occur. Overall, this edited volume provides a macro-level overview and detailed empirical case studies of triangulation in corpus linguistics that are an important step forward in enhancing the methodological rigor of the field. However, this emphasis on methods might leave readers wondering where the identity of corpus linguistics lies and what role its own theoretical frameworks can play. Methodological triangulation in linguistic research relies on multiple data sources, measurements and even observational units (human participants, vs corpus texts). The methodology itself should not only be selfdiscovery, transparent and capable of being replicated and repeated, but it must be generalisable as well; thus, generalisation of the new paradigm or framework of convergence in research methodology is essential, as well as a clear system of measures to evaluate or assess the contribution of triangulation.