Abstract:Among the most important questions given a thermal collapse event in a burning plasma experiment such as ITER, is that of how many seed electrons are available for runaway acceleration. In this study, we use the kinetic equation for electrons and ions to investigate how different cooling scenarios lead to different seed distributions for runaway electrons. The nonlinear electron-electron collisions, as well as linear electron-ion collisions are included, with electrons and ions sourced to model impurity injection. We calculate the probability to runaway including the collisional drag of background electrons, pitch angle scattering, and synchrotron and Bremsstrahlung radiation. Projecting this probability on the distribution function determines the number of seed electrons Ns. When Ns exceeds the number of relativistic electrons needed to produce the entire equilibrium current, fast transfer to runaway current is possible. Alternatively, Ns can be small enough that the runaway process is too slow to cause any significant runaway population on the experimental timescale. Between these limits, the avalanche process determines the runaway population. We find that the conditions for fast transfer are unlikely due to the timescales for equilibration of the low and high temperature electrons given an impurity injection. Well before ITER operations begin ten years from now, we must have established a comprehensive understanding of the potential for runaway electron generation, as well as methods for their control and mitigation, as the destructive potential to the plasma facing components is severely intolerable[1]. According to some predictions, as the plasma current in ITER is raised to about 15 MA, up to 70% of this thermal electron current could be quickly converted into 10 MeV runaway electron current if the plasma temperature drops well below 1 keV for any reason, potentially endangering the integrity of the chamber walls. This makes for a unique situation in requiring an assessment based on plasma theory and computation well before critical validation experiments can be performed. Among the most important questions given a thermal collapse event is that of how many seed electrons are available for runaway acceleration and the avalanche process. Seed electrons remain with a kinetic energy above the critical energy for runaway after a thermal quench, either natural or induced. The distribution of these seed electrons in momentum and pitch angle, along with given driving electric field and dissipative effects,

Runaway Electron Effects

Effects of runaway electrons on plasma facing components

Runaway-electron formation and electron slide-away in an ITER post-disruption scenario

Calculation of the runaway electron current in tokamak disruptions

Assessment of runaway electron beam termination and impact in ITER

Runaway dynamics in reactor-scale spherical tokamak disruptions

Runaway dynamics in the DT phase of ITER operations in the presence of massive material injection

Runaway electron generation during tokamak start-up

Effect of Magnetic Fluctuations on the Confinement and Dynamics of Runaway Electrons in the HT-7 Tokamak

1 TH / P 1-35 Collisional generation of runaway electron seed distributions leading to sub-criticality , avalanche , or fast transfer

Kinetic modelling of runaway electrons in dynamic scenarios

Mechanisms of plasma disruption and runaway electron losses in tokamaks

Runaway electron beam formation, vertical motion, termination and wall loads in EU-DEMO

Effects of magnetic perturbations and radiation on the runaway avalanche

Efficient calculation of the moments of runaway electron distribution functions

Runaway electron mitigation by 3D fields application in ASDEX Upgrade, COMPASS, and RFX-mod

Study of runaway electrons in TUMAN-3M tokamak plasmas

Axisymmetric predictions for mitigated and vertically unstable disruptions in ITER with runaway electrons

Runaway electron modelling in the self-consistent core European Transport Simulator, ETS

Electron runaway in ASDEX Upgrade experiments of varying core temperature

Runaway electron current reconstitution after a non-axisymmetric magnetohydrodynamic flush