Abstract:Among the most important questions given a thermal collapse event in a burning plasma experiment such as ITER, is that of how many seed electrons are available for runaway acceleration. In this study, we use the kinetic equation for electrons and ions to investigate how different cooling scenarios lead to different seed distributions for runaway electrons. The nonlinear electron-electron collisions, as well as linear electron-ion collisions are included, with electrons and ions sourced to model impurity injection. We calculate the probability to runaway including the collisional drag of background electrons, pitch angle scattering, and synchrotron and Bremsstrahlung radiation. Projecting this probability on the distribution function determines the number of seed electrons Ns. When Ns exceeds the number of relativistic electrons needed to produce the entire equilibrium current, fast transfer to runaway current is possible. Alternatively, Ns can be small enough that the runaway process is too slow to cause any significant runaway population on the experimental timescale. Between these limits, the avalanche process determines the runaway population. We find that the conditions for fast transfer are unlikely due to the timescales for equilibration of the low and high temperature electrons given an impurity injection. Well before ITER operations begin ten years from now, we must have established a comprehensive understanding of the potential for runaway electron generation, as well as methods for their control and mitigation, as the destructive potential to the plasma facing components is severely intolerable[1]. According to some predictions, as the plasma current in ITER is raised to about 15 MA, up to 70% of this thermal electron current could be quickly converted into 10 MeV runaway electron current if the plasma temperature drops well below 1 keV for any reason, potentially endangering the integrity of the chamber walls. This makes for a unique situation in requiring an assessment based on plasma theory and computation well before critical validation experiments can be performed. Among the most important questions given a thermal collapse event is that of how many seed electrons are available for runaway acceleration and the avalanche process. Seed electrons remain with a kinetic energy above the critical energy for runaway after a thermal quench, either natural or induced. The distribution of these seed electrons in momentum and pitch angle, along with given driving electric field and dissipative effects,

Assessment of runaway electron beam termination and impact in ITER

Runaway Electron Effects

Effects of runaway electrons on plasma facing components

Axisymmetric predictions for mitigated and vertically unstable disruptions in ITER with runaway electrons

Mechanisms of plasma disruption and runaway electron losses in tokamaks

Calculation of the runaway electron current in tokamak disruptions

Runaway electron dynamics in ITER disruptions with shattered pellet injections

Runaway dynamics in the DT phase of ITER operations in the presence of massive material injection

Confinement of passing and trapped runaway electrons in the simulation of an ITER current quench

Runaway-electron formation and electron slide-away in an ITER post-disruption scenario

The effect of vertical displacements on the runaway electron avalanche in ITER mitigated disruptions

Runaway dynamics in reactor-scale spherical tokamak disruptions

The hot-tail runaway seed landscape during the thermal quench in tokamaks

Energy lossand pitch-angle scattering of runaway electrons due to kinetic instabilities

Mechanism of runaway electron beam formation during plasma disruptions in tokamaks

Overview of runaway current suppression and dissipation on J-TEXT tokamak

Runaway electron beam formation, vertical motion, termination and wall loads in EU-DEMO

A Novel Path to Runaway Electron Mitigation Via Deuterium Injection and Current-Driven MHD Instability

1 TH / P 1-35 Collisional generation of runaway electron seed distributions leading to sub-criticality , avalanche , or fast transfer

First numerical analysis of runaway electron generation in tungsten-rich plasmas towards ITER