Abstract:Background Multi-site studies facilitate the study of rare outcomes or exposures through integrating patient information from several distinct care sites. Due to patient privacy concerns, sharing of patient-level information among collaborating sites is often prohibited, suggesting a need for privacy-preserving data analysis methods. Several such methods exist, but have been shown to sometimes result in biased estimation or require extensive communication among sites. Objective We present a communication-efficient, privacy-preserving method for performing distributed regression on Electronic Health Records (EHR) data across multiple sites for zero-inflated count outcomes. Our approach is motivated by two real-world data problems: examining risk factors associated with pediatric avoidable hospitalization and modeling frequency of serious adverse events in colorectal cancer patients. Methods We use hurdle regression, a two-part (logistic-Poisson) regression model, to characterize the effects of risk factors on zero-inflated count outcomes. We develop a one-shot algorithm for performing hurdle regression (ODAH) across multiple sites, using individual patient data at one site and aggregated data from all other sites to approximate the complete data log likelihood. We evaluate ODAH through extensive simulations and an application to EHR data from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. We compare ODAH estimates to those from meta-analysis and pooled analysis (all patient data pooled together, the gold standard). Results In simulations, ODAH estimates exhibited bias relative to the gold standard of less than 0.1% across several settings. In contrast, meta-analysis estimated exhibited relative bias up to 12.7%, largely dependent on event rate. When applying ODAH to CHOP data, relative biases for estimates in both components of the hurdle model were less than 5.1%, while meta-analysis estimates exhibited relative bias as high as 63.6%. When analyzing OneFlorida data, ODAH relative biases were less than 10% for eight of the ten estimated coefficients, while meta-analysis estimates again showed substantially greater bias. Conclusions Our simulations and real-world applications suggest ODAH is a promising method for performing privacy-preserving distributed learning on EHR data when modeling zero-inflated count outcomes.

Power Estimation Using the Exemplary Dataset for Ordinal Data in the Presence of Nonproportional Odds

Risk prediction models for discrete ordinal outcomes: calibration and the impact of the proportional odds assumption

Synthesis of spherical silver nanoparticles by digestive ripening, stabilization with various agents, and their 3-D and 2-D superlattice formation.

Sample Size and Power Determination for a Binary Outcome and an Ordinal Exposure when Logistic Regression Analysis Is Planned

Learning from Local to Global - an Efficient Distributed Algorithm for Modeling Time-to-event Data

A Utility-Based Design for Randomized Comparative Trials with Ordinal Outcomes and Prognostic Subgroups

Distributed Learning from Multi-Site Observational Health Data for Zero-Inflated Count Outcomes

Robust and efficient estimation in ordinal response models using the density power divergence

Statistical Inference for Ordinal Predictors in Generalized Linear and Additive Models with Application to Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Proportional odds logistic regression—effective means of dealing with limited uncertainty in dichotomizing clinical outcomes

Alternative Analysis Methods for Time to Event Endpoints under Non-proportional Hazards: A Comparative Analysis

A Potential Outcomes, and Typically More Powerful, Alternative to 'Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel'

Ordinal regression models made easy: A tutorial on parameter interpretation, data simulation and power analysis

Comparison of Dichotomized and Distributional Approaches in Rare Event Clinical Trial Design: a Fixed Bayesian Design

Statistical Considerations for Evaluating Treatment Effect under Various Non-proportional Hazard Scenarios

Evidence for fractional laser treatment in the improvement of cutaneous scars.

Comparison of paired ordinal data with mis-classification and covariates adjustment

Meta-Analysis of Ordinal Data and Its Solution by SAS

Increasing power for observational studies of aberrant response: An adaptive approach

Alternative Analysis Methods for Time to Event Endpoints Under Nonproportional Hazards: A Comparative Analysis

Power and Sample Size for Dose-Finding Studies with Survival Endpoints under Model Uncertainty.