Abstract:This paper extends the theory of"bureaucratic&economic markets"and reinterprets the unique growth mechanism of the Chinese economy and the intriguing interaction between government and market.In China we observe an interesting"mutual embededness"of bureaucratic markets for local officials and economic markets for firms across jurisdictions:local leaders compete in bureaucratic markets where their promotion is closely linked with economic performance of firms in their jurisdictions,and in the meantime,firms compete in economic markets and receive critical support for their respective jurisdictional governments.The performance-based bureaucratic competition motivates local leaders to help local firms grow and win the economic competition,and the interregional mobility of physical and human capital limits the tendency of local leaders to predate or grab local firms.The economic performance of firms in market competition provides feedback and is an ultimate test of the effectiveness of government-business cooperation and local industrial policies.The extended theory of"bureaucratic&economic markets"contributes to the existing literature by highlighting three critical preconditions for effective government-market cooperation:providing political incentives to ensure bureaucrats"do things in the right way",external market constraints to"prevent bureaucrats from doing evil",and necessary information feedback to guide bureaucrats to"do the right thing".For any country or region,its ability to satisfy these three conditions becomes critical for fostering an effective interaction between government and market and sustaining economic growth. In the past decades China has shaped a growth model based on the interplay of"bureaucratic & economic markets"which generally satisfied the three preconditions and laid the institutional foundation for China's economic miracle. This dual-markets model has resulted in friendly handshaking between political and private entrepreneurs, productive cooperation between political and economic elites,and a remarkable combination of China' s time-honored heritage of strong bureaucracy with the western tradition of market economy. The dual-markets model also has its limitations,especially in the sphere of provision of public services,which exactly explains various"government failures"associated with China's high economic growth in the past 40 years.

Saltiness and Power: the Market in Zigong Salt Industry

The Nature of the Market:From an Invisible Hand to a Tangible Network

An Investigation of Moral Basis of Market Society from the Perspective of Social Morals

The Monopoly Management And The Dilemma Of Salt Producer In The Liang Huai Salt Industry

The Group Gaming and Benefit Distribution in the Liang Huai Salt Industry——The Reforming Practices and Its Dilemma in Salt Industry by Zhang Jian

Underground Hangzhou: the Challenge of Safety Vs. Commerciality in a Major Chinese City

The Logic of Reform: from Market Mechanism to Market Society

"Bureaucratic & Economic Markets"and China's Growth Story

Continuity and Change in China'S Rural Periodic Markets

Toward a Social Practice Theory of Market:A Further Diversion

Making Sense of the Chinese “socialist Market Economy”

Multiple Problematisations: the Logics Governing Wet Markets in Two Chinese Cities

Enlightenment of “discourses on salt and iron” in salt iron specializes system

Group Competitions and Benefit Distribution in the Salt Industry in Huaibei Areas, 1700-1932: the Rent-seeking Activities of Merchant Groups

Market Management of Water Resource

Analysis on salt mine resources and its industrial situation in China

Logical Analysis of Electricity Spot Market Design in Foreign Countries and Enlightenment and Policy Suggestions for China

Relationship Between Power and Market in the Process of Stratification:a Reflection on Studies of Chinese Stratification

Expanding and developing the theoretical implications of socialist market economy with China's experience

A Study on the Characteristics of the Stock Market in Modern China

Equalization of Land Property Rights and Marketization of the Production Factors:Historical Comparison and Theoretical Enlightenment