Abstract:We propose a model-free omnibus statistical procedure to check whether the direction of changes in an economic variable is predictable using the history of its past changes. A class of separate inference procedures are also given to gauge possible sources of directional predictability. They can reveal information about whether the direction of future changes is predictable using the direction, level, volatility, skewness, and kurtosis of past changes. An important feature of the proposed procedures is that they check many lags simultaneously, which is particularly suitable for detecting the alternatives whose directional dependence is small at each lag but it carries over a long distributional lag. At the same time, the tests naturally discount higher order lags, which is consistent with the conventional wisdom that financial markets are more influenced by the recent past events than by the remote past events. We apply the proposed procedures to four daily U.S. stock price indices. We find overwhelming evidence that the directions of excess stock returns are predictable using past excess stock returns, and the evidence is stronger for the directional predictability of large excess stock returns. In particular, the direction and level of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with any threshold, and the volatility, skewness and kurtosis of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with nonzero thresholds (i.e., large returns). The well-known strong volatility clustering together with weak serial dependence in mean cannot completely explain all documented directional predictability for stock returns. To exploit the economic significance of the documented directional predictability for stock returns, we consider a class of autologit models for directional forecasts and find that they have significant out-of-sample directional predictive power. Some trading strategies based on these models and their combinations can earn significant out-of-sample extra risk-adjusted returns over the buy-and-hold trading strategy.

Stock Market, Economic Performance and Presidential Elections: Was the Market Right About the Presidents for Their Capability of Enhancing Economy?

Stock Market, Economic Performance and Presidential Elections

Should Stock Market Return Forecasts Be Conditioned on Politics

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION UNCERTAINTY AND COMMON STOCK RETURNS IN THE UNITED STATES

Chinese Stock Market Volatility and the Role of U.S. Economic Variables

Forecasting Bull and Bear Markets: Evidence from China

Breaking the general election effect. The impact of the 2020 US presidential election on Chinese economy and counter strategies

Presidential Rhetoric and the Economy

Minute-by-Minute: Financial Markets' Reaction to the 2020 U.S. Election

Political change, elections, and stock market indicators: a generalized method of moment analysis

Political Cycles and Stock Returns

Analysis of the Economic Impact of the US Presidential Candidates on the United States and China

Detecting the Macroeconomic Factors in Chinese Stock Market Returns: A Generalized Dynamic Factor Model Approach

Political elections and uncertainty -Are BRICS markets equally exposed to Trump's agenda?

Essays on Microeconomic Applications in Political Economy and Business Strategy

The impact of presidential economic approval rating on stock volatility: An industrial perspective

Are the Directions of Stock Price Changes Predictable ? Statistical Theory and Evidence

An Analysis of the Impact of the US Presidential Election on the Sino-US Economy

Economic Forces in Stock Returns

Dynamics in the Co-Movement of Economic Growth and Stock Return: Comparison Between the United States and China

Forecasting U.S. Stock Returns Conditional on Geopolitical Risk and Business Cycles