Abstract:Objective: To study the effect of intervertebral grafting area on the effect of single segment lumbar posterior decompression and intervertebral bone grafting fusion. Methods: The clinical data of 52 patients who underwent single-segment lumbar posterior decompression pedicle internal fixation and bone grafting fusion from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospective reviewed. The area of the intervertebral bone graft was measured one week postoperatively using Computed Tomography (CT), and based on the ratio of the bone graft area to the average area of the endplates, the patients were divided into three groups:17 cases in group A(the intervertebral bone graft area did not exceed the area of one pedicle) included 9 males and 8 females with an average age of (56.0±11.5) years old;15 cases in group B(the intervertebral bone graft area exceeded one pedicle but did not reach the opposite pedicle) included 10 males and 5 females with an average of (52.0±14.0) years old; 20 cases in group C (the intervertebral bone graft area exceeded the opposite pedicle) included 12 males and 8 females with an average of (49.5±12.8) years old. X-rays and CT scans were performed at 3, 6, 12 months, and the final follow-up postoperatively, the interbody fusion Brantigan scores, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at each follow-up were recorded. Results: The gender, age, and surgical segments showed no significant differences among three groups(P>0.05). There was also no significant difference in the preoperative VAS and ODI among three groups (P>0.05). All patients of three groups were followed up from 12 to 36 months. Compared with preoperative, VAS and ODI scores of three groups showed significant improvement at 1 week postoperatively and the final follow-up (P<0.05). Compared with preoperative measurements, the height of the intervertebral space was restored at 1 week postoperatively in three groups;at the final follow-up, the loss of height in the intervertebral space was less in groups B and C, and the height of the intervertebral space in group B and C was significantly higher than in group A(P<0.05). The modified Brantigan scores at 3 and 6 months postoperatively were significantly higher in group C than in groups A and B (P<0.05);at 12 months postoperatively, the scores in groups B and C were significantly higher than in group A(P<0.05);however, at the final follow-up, there was no significant difference in the modified Brantigan scores among three groups(P>0.05). The bone graft fusion rate in group C was significantly higher than in groups A and B at 3 months postoperatively(P<0.05);at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the fusion rates in groups B and C were significantly higher than in group A(P<0.05);at the final follow-up, the fusion rate in group A was still lower than in groups B and C, but the difference among three groups was not significant(P>0.05). Conclusion: Single segment posterior lumbar decompression and interbody fusion surgery can significantly improve the clinical symptoms of patients with lumbar degenerative related diseases. However, as the proportion of bone grafting area increases, the early bone grafting fusion rate and fusion score of patients are significantly improved.

Three Dimensional Computed Tomography (3D-CT) and Radiographs Assessment of Interbody Fusion after Posterior Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion

Characteristics of Computed Tomography Multiplanar Reconstruction in Assessing Interbody Fusion

Radiographic and clinical outcome of crenel lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with severe facet joint arthropathy

Comparative study of three surgical procedures of lumbar interbody fusion for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis

[Application of three-dimensional printed porous titanium alloy cage and poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion]

Biomechanical Evaluation of Intervertebral Fusion Process After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Study

The postoperative clinical effects of utilizing 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cages in posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study

Biomechanical properties analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transpedicular oblique screw fixation

[Clinical study on real-time three-dimensional CT navigation-guided full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion].

Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis

Comparative Study of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disease

A clinical comparison of three bone graft materials for posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of in situ and reductive interbody fusion of lumbar spondylolisthesis

Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion: morphometric change of intervertebral structure

Comparison Between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.

[Posterior Interbody Fusion Versus Improved Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Segmental Spinal Fixation for Aged Spondylolisthesis with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis].

Clinical Application of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Report of 21 Cases

[Effect of intervertebral bone graft area on the effect of single-level posterior lumbar decompression and bone graft fusion]

Trabecular Bone Remodeling After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Three-Dimensional Porous Tantalum and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and internal fixation for complete thoracolumbar fracture and dislocation

[Posterior Fusion Versus Posterior Interbody Fusion in Segmental Spinal Fixation for Aged Spondylolisthesis].