Abstract:Research summary: Drawing on the “varieties of capitalism” literature, we develop an actor-centered framework that explains firm-level corporate social performance (CSP) by emphasizing the importance of considering owners’ and other stakeholders’ motives towards CSP — which can be instrumental, relational or moral — and their salience in the national institutional setting. Results from an international panel show that investment company (government) ownership has a stronger negative (positive) relationship with CSP in liberal markets, in which owners are the key stakeholder, as compared to coordinated markets, which counterbalance the interests of multiple stakeholders. Family and company ownership have weaker links to CSP across institutional settings. We discuss implications for research and practice and argue that CSP policies may hold more relevance in liberal rather than coordinated market economies.Managerial summary: Existing debates focus on the impact of corporate social performance (CSP) on firm outcomes. Less is known about the motives and pressures behind CSP, which may explain its variability across firms and institutional settings. We argue that powerful owners’ motives are important for explaining CSP in liberal markets, where shareholders are the most important stakeholder, as compared to coordinated markets, which confer prominence to multiple stakeholders. Owners’ motives are not homogeneous and depending on the type of owners the link between ownership concentration and CSP can be negative (for investment companies) or positive (for governments). In coordinated markets, owners have a weaker impact on CSP, which is mostly attributable to their lower salience relative to stakeholders, rather than to a change in their motives.

Towards a Property Rights View of Government Ownership

The Level of Decentralization and Property Rights Protection––a Sociological Analysis of Property Rights

The Social Construction Logic of Property Rights:A review on the property rights studies of Chinese sociologists from the perspective of game theory

Insecure Property Rights and Government Ownership of Firms

Property Rights, Owner-Management, and Value Creation

Legal Protections Given Investors and Ownership Structure

Ownership Competence

Divergent Interests between Central and Local Governments: Testing Theories of Public Ownership

Ownership Structure,Selfish Effort,and the Holdup Problem

How Does Government Ownership Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from China’s Privatization Experience

Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit

The Role and Connotation of Individual Ability Difference in Origin of Property Rights

How Do Various Forms of Ownership Impact Firm Performance?

Research on Reform of SOEs Based on the Theory of Property Rights Capture

Property in Transition: Conflicts over Ownership in Post-Socialist Shanghai

Ultimate Ownership, Institutions And Listed Companies' Debt Financing Based On The Perspective Of Controlling Shareholders

Property Rights Problems in Agricultural Cooperatives: A Heterodox Institutionalist Perspective

The Pressure Behind Corporate Social Performance: Ownership and Institutional Configurations

Property Rights, Finance, and Reinvestment: Evidence from China's Private Enterprises

Ultimate ownership, institutions and listed companies' debt financing

Do as I Say, Not as I Do: Tax Avoidance by State-Owned Firms