Abstract:In 1986, Teece proposed a seminal framework for analyzing why innovators may fail to benefit from their innovations. He argued, in part, that firms with the requisite complementary assets can often expropriate an innovator's returns especially when appropriability regimes are weak. In this paper, we explore the implications of this framework from the perspective of an incumbent firm—more precisely, of investors in that firm—facing innovation by established corporate rivals and by inventors from outside its industry. We demonstrate that the financial-market value of publicly traded firms depends on patented innovation by competitors (both established rivals and industry outsiders). Our empirical study generates three main results. First, the financial-market value of an incumbent is negatively associated with “important” patenting by outside inventors. Second, in industries characterized by weak appropriability regimes or by a strong reliance on complementary assets, this relationship is reversed: important patenting by outsiders is positively associated with the incumbent's financial-market value. Third, the effect of outsiders’ patented innovation on the focal incumbent is qualitatively different than that of established rivals’ patented innovation on the incumbent. These results are consistent with implications of Teece [Teece, D., 1986. Profiting from Innovation, Research Policy] and with recently developed models that formalize elements of his framework. More generally, these results support theories about both the market-stealing and spillover effects of innovation.

Do Anti-Takeover Provisions Spur Corporate Innovation?

Do Antitakeover Provisions Spur Corporate Innovation? A Regression Discontinuity Analysis

Anti-Takeover Provisions , Innovation , and Firm Value : A Regression Discontinuity Analysis

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting

Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation, and Innovation

Busy Boards, Entrenched Directors and Corporate Innovation

Corporate Venture Capital and Firm Technology Innovation: the Moderating Effect of Absorptive Capacity, Involvement Intensity and CVC Program Government Structure

Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?

(When) Do Stronger Patents Increase Continual Innovation?

Banks’ Interventions and Firms’ Innovation: Evidence from Debt Covenant Violations

The Real Effects of Tournament Incentives: the Case of Firm Innovation

Stay Vigilant in Peace Time? Antitakeover Provisions and Corporate Social Responsibility

Do long‐term institutional investors foster corporate innovation?

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND INNOVATION: A SURVEY

Corporate governance drivers of firm innovation capacity

Creditor Interventions and Firm Innovation : Evidence from Debt Covenant Violations

Stock Pledge, Risk of Losing Control and Corporate Innovation

The impact of big tech corporate venture capital investments on innovation: Evidence from the equity investment market

Profiting from technological innovation by others: The effect of competitor patenting on firm value

The Impact of Private Equity on Corporate Innovation