The Evidence of Dual Conflict in the Evaluation of Brand Extension: an Event-Related Potential Study

Qingguo Ma,Jia Jin,Qing Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2014.889930
2014-01-01
Journal of Management Analytics
Abstract:Brand extension is one of the central issues in marketing research. The current study employs event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the electrophysiological process when subjects make a decision to accept or reject a brand extension composed of two words (W1W2). W1 is always a beverage brand name, and W2 a product name among three product categories: household appliance product (extension type BH), snack product (BS), and beverage product (BB). The behavior and ERPs data showed that subjects found it easy to accept the brand extension in the BB condition, medium in the BS and hard in the BH situation. The negative slow waves in different cortexes suggested that there are two cognitive conflict processes in evaluating a brand extension in the W1W2 paradigm: the conflict between W1 and W2, and the conflict between the whole information of W1W2 and the information retrieved from memory about the products under the brand name in W1.Keywords: ERPsNSWsbrand extensiondual conflictneuromanagement AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by grant No. 09JZD0006 from the State Education Ministry of China as a key project, No. 09CGGL008YBB from the Social Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, and obtained financial support from the 211 Project of the State Education Ministry. The authors thank Xiaoyi Wang, Qiang Shen for assistance with data acquisition.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?