Abstract:Due to a rapid economic growth over the past several decades China has significantly strengthened its international positions. This growth in its own turn was to a large extent due to a pragmatic and sound foreign strategy that the country has been pursuing since mid-1970s. However, in recent years both within and outside China there has been an on-going debate on the alleged radical transformation of the PRC’s perceptions of its national interests, its place in world politics, and its foreign policy. The variety of opinions becomes increasingly complicated as the number of discussants grows and new arguments are adduced in support of different positions. Whereas outside China this debate structures around the narrative of the Chinese assertiveness, within the country the main dispute is between the advocates of a traditional policy of ‘keeping a low profile’ (taoguang yanghui) and proponents of a new ‘striving for achievements’ (fenfa youwei) strategy. The present paper aims to provide a framework for a systematization of debates on the contemporary foreign policy of China in the English language academic literature based on two criteria: whether a researcher admits that the Chinese foreign policy is changing and how he assesses implications of these changes. Such an approach undoubtedly entails certain schematization of the presented views and arguments. However, it differs favorably from traditional, more narrative approaches to conceptualization of the debate since it establishes a clear, transparent theoretical framework aimed to identify the substantive core of the presented views. This, in turn, can bring about a better understanding of the current state and possible evolution of Chinese foreign policy in general. The author concludes that although these debates are far from being over, most researchers admit the PRC’s foreign policy strategy is undergoing a radical transformation. Since the latter half of 2000s there has been a steady trend in the foreign policy of China towards greater assertiveness. At the same time this transformation ensures continuity of the basic principles of Chinese diplomacy. All this means that further debates on the Chinese foreign policy should focus primarily on potential implications of this transformation for the PRC, the regional dynamics and international relations system as a whole.

New Dimensions of Chinese Foreign Policy

China's International Relations in the 21st Century: Dynamics of Paradigm Shifts

China’s New Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping

On China’s Modern Foreign Policy Through the Prism of the Concepts of “Dao” and “Shi”

Chinese Foreign Relations Grand Strategies: From Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping

China's New Foreign Policy: Not Conflict but Convergence of Interests

Changing Media, Changing Foreign Policy in China

Reassessing China’s Rise

Change in the International Order-and China's Options

Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

Theory and Practice in China’s Approaches to Multilateralism and Critical Reflections on the Western ‘Rules-Based International Order’

China’s Search for a Grand Strategy: A Rising Great Power Finds Its Way

China Diplomacy 3. 0: China New Diplomacy in Post 18th Party Congress

Learning to Live with the Hegemon: Evolution of China's Policy Toward the US Since the End of the Cold War

New Thinking about the Taiwan Issue : Theoretical insights into its origins, dynamics, and prospects

Covering China’s New Development Pattern: Issues and Strategies for Transcultural Communication

COMPREHENSION OF “GREAT POWER DIPLOMACY WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS”. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES

Americans in China

Power Shift: China and Asia's New Dynamics * Shambaugh David (ed.) * Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006. * ISBN 0-520-245-377, $60.00

Disputing Chinese Views on Power

CONCEPTUALIZING CHINA'S ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY Conversion Between Wealth and Power