Abstract:The autoignition kinetics of hydrocarbons is an important criterion for selecting fuels for piston reciprocating engines, and it can be determined by relative performance to mixtures of alkanes, n-heptane and iso-octane, under certain standardized operating conditions. 2-methylfuran is a potential biofuel candidate, whose autoignition chemistry is markedly different from alkanes. Its octane behavior when blended with paraffins also shows a marked difference. The blending octane behavior of a fuel is characterized by its Blending Octane Number (BON). The BON of 2-methylfuran was extensively characterized in this work. 2-methylfuran?s BON was mapped from experimental ignition delay times measured in a constant volume combustion chamber using established correlations. The effect on BON was studied depending on the RON of the base fuel into which 2-methylfuran was blended, as well as the quantity of 2-methylfuran blended. BON of 2-methyfuran was greater than its RON by a factor of four or more for some blends studied. BON reduced with increasing RON of the base fuel, as well as with increasing quantity of 2-methylfuran blended. A chemical kinetic model was created by integration of well validated sub-models for the blend components, and then used to explain the chemical kinetics leading to the extremely high BON values of 2-methylfuran. The synergetic anti-knock blending effect of 2-methylfuran is partially due to its physical properties leading to a greater molar fraction per volume fraction in the blend compared to iso-octane. Analysis using chemical kinetic model revealed that the chemical action behind 2-methylfuran's blending octane behavior was due to its ability to quench OH radicals which are important to the low-temperature oxidation chemistry of alkanes. This quenching effect is achieved due to the more rapid reaction rate of 2-methylfuran with OH radical compared to iso-octane, followed by the immediate conversion of the adduct shifting the equilibrium towards the product. (c) 2020 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Experimental Investigation on Lubricity of 2,5-Dimethylfuran Blends

On the fundamental lubricity of 2,5-dimethylfuran as a synthetic engine fuel

Effect of Spark Timing and Load on A Disi Engine Fuelled with 2,5-Dimethylfuran

Experimental Research on Gasoline Engine Fueled with DMF

Spray Characteristics and Engine Adaptability of 2,5-Dimethylfuran

Laminar Burning Velocities of 2,5-Dimethylfuran Compared with Ethanol and Gasoline

Understanding the synergistic blending octane behavior of 2-methylfuran

Engine Combustion and Emissions Characteristics of 2-Methylfuran and Gasoline Blend Fuels

Experimental investigation on short-time and long-time tribological performance of Fischer-Tropsch fuel compared with fossil diesel

Assessing fuel properties effects of 2,5-dimethylfuran on microscopic and macroscopic characteristics of oxygenated fuel/diesel blends spray

Combustion characteristics and emissions of 2-methylfuran compared to 2,5-dimethylfuran, gasoline and ethanol in a DISI engine

Combustion and Emissions of 2,5-Dimethylfuran in a Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Engine

Experiment of a gasoline engine fueled with gasoline-DMF blends and gasoline-alcohol blends

Characterization of the Lubricity of Bio-Oil/diesel Fuel Blends by High Frequency Reciprocating Test Rig

Numerical study of DMF and gasoline spray and mixture preparation in a GDI engine

Effects of blending 2,5-dimethylfuran on the laminar burning velocity and ignition delay time of isooctane/air mixture

Spray Characteristics Study Of Dmf Using Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer

Experimental Study of 2,5-Dimethylfuran and 2-Methylfuran in a Rapid Compression Machine: Comparison of the Ignition Delay Times and Reactivity at Low to Intermediate Temperature

Combustion Characteristics and Engine Performance of 2-Methylfuran Compared to Gasoline and Ethanol in a Direct Injection Spark Ignition Engine

Study on Lubricity Assessment Method of Coal-base Alternative Fuel for Vehicle

Combustion performance of 2,5-dimethylfuran blends using dual-injection compared to direct-injection in a SI engine