Abstract:Environmental pollution liability insurance is becoming increasingly important for China to achieve its emission reduction targets. Insurance pricing is a crucial factor restricting the market share of environment pollution liability insurance, from the perspective of the Black-Scholes pricing model, which in turn has influenced the solvency of insurance companies in China. Firstly, this study analyzes the problems existing in compulsory liability insurance for environmental pollution in China. It proceeds with analyzing the price of compulsory environmental pollution liability insurance using the Black-Scholes pricing model, and derives a high premium insurance rate of 2.44%. Moreover, it performs a multivariate regression analysis using the asset and liability data, taken from the annual report, to identify three key factors affecting the solvency adequacy ratio, namely, capital debt ratio, reflecting the company asset structure; net interest rate on assets, reflecting the asset scale with actual solvency; and claim ratio, reflecting the business quality. Based on the results of regression analysis and robustness test for the China Insurance Clauses (CIC) company, People's Insurance Company of China (PICC), and Asia-Pacific Property & Casualty Insurance (API) company, it is shown that the effect of total asset, total debt, capital debt ratio, claim ratio, and net interest rate on assets on the solvency adequacy ratio is significant, with respect to the size of the coefficients. Based on the Black-Scholes pricing model found in the previous cycle of liability insurance, and keeping in view the existing problems of environmental pollution liability insurance expenditure, this paper presents suggestions that are conducive to improving the solvency of insurance companies in China.

Risk-Based Pricing and Risk-Reducing Effort: Does the Private Insurance Market Reduce Environmental Accidents?

Does Private Insurance Reduce Environmental Accidents

Can Environmental Insurance Succeed Where Other Strategies Fail? the Case of Underground Storage Tanks

Contamination and Incomplete Information:: Bounding Implicit Prices using High-Profile Leaks

Environmental Taxes under Mixed Duopoly: the Roles of Privatization and Foreign Eco-Technology

Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance Pricing and the Solvency of Insurance Companies in China: Based on the Black-Scholes Model

Is moral hazard good for the environment? Revenue insurance and chemical input use

Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance in China: In Need of Strong Government Backing

Optimal Road Pricing for Both Traffic Efficiency and Safety

Securitization product design for China’s environmental pollution liability insurance

Environmental liability insurance, green innovation, and mediation effect study

The Role of Insurance in Reducing Losses from Extreme Events: The Need for Public–Private Partnerships

Flood insurance redesigned: Regulatory considerations for a viable and sustainable private market

Pricing environmental health risks: survey assessments of risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis

The Relationship Between Regulatory Pressure and Insurer Risk Taking

The role of public and private insurance in reducing losses from extreme weather events and disasters

Does environmental pollution liability insurance promote environmental performance? Firm-level evidence from quasi-natural experiment in China

Environmental pollution liability insurance and commercial credit financing

Environmental Risk: A Comparative Law and Economics Approach to Liability and Insurance