Equation of State, Phase Stability of (mg0.92, Fe0.08)SiO3 Perovskite from Shock Wave Study and Its Geophysical Implications

ZZ Gong,F Dai,YW Fei,L Zhang,FQ Jing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1780510
2004-01-01
AIP Conference Proceedings
Abstract:13 shots of shock compression data were measured for enstatite (mg(0.92), Fe-0.08)SiO3 with initial density of 3.06g/cm(3) up to 140 GPa, using impedance-match method and electrical probe technique. The relationship between shock wave velocity D and particle velocity u can been described linearly by: D = 3.76 +1.48u(km/s), and no evidence of phase transition was shown in the experimental shock pressure range. Our experimental Hugoniot is about 7% denser than the model Hugoniot of (Mg-0.92, Fe-0.08)O (Mw.) Plus SiO2(St.) calculated by additive principle. This excluded the possibility that chemical decomposition of enstatite with perovskite structure to oxides would happen during shock compression up to 140GPa. The Gruneisen parameter gammaobtained by fitted our experimental data to: gamma=gamma0 (rho(0)/rho)(q), yields gamma(0)=1.84, q=1.69, with rho(0)=4.19g/cm(3). By using the third-order Birch-Mumaghan finite strain equation of state (EOS), Our shock experimental data yield a zero-pressure bulk modulus K-0s=260.09GPa and pressure derivative K-0s=4.17, given our new value of gamma, with rho(0)=4.19g/cm(3). From density constraint only, the purely perovskite model of (Mg1-x,Fe-x)SiO3 (x=0similar to0.1) can explain that of PREM well.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?