Abstract:In multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM), one of the most important problems is to determine the weights of criteria and experts. This paper intends to present two Min-Max models to optimize the point estimates of the weights. Since each expert generally possesses a uniform viewpoint on the importance (weighted value) of each criterion when he/she needs to rank the alternatives, the objective function in the first model is to minimize the maximum variation between the actual score vector and the ideal one for all the alternatives such that the optimal weights of criteria are consistent in ranking all the alternatives for the same expert. The second model is designed to optimize the weights of experts such that the obtained overall evaluation for each alternative can collect the perspectives of the experts as many as possible. Thus, the objective function in the second model is to minimize the maximum variation between the actual vector of evaluations and the ideal one for all the experts, such that the optimal weights can reduce the difference among the experts in evaluating the same alternative. For the constructed Min-Max models, another focus in this paper is on the development of an efficient algorithm for the optimal weights. Some applications are employed to show the significance of the models and algorithm. From the numerical results, it is clear that the developed Min-Max models more effectively solve the MCGDM problems including the ones with incomplete score matrices, compared with the methods available in the literature. Specifically, by the proposed method, (1) the evaluation uniformity of each expert on the same criteria is guaranteed; (2) The overall evaluation for each alternative can collect the judgements of the experts as many as possible; (3) The highest discrimination degree of the alternatives is obtained.

New Min-Max Approach To Optimal Choice Of The Weights In Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Problems

A Min-Max Method With Adaptive Weightings For Uniformly Spaced Pareto Optimum Points

Weighting Models to Generate Weights and Capacities in Multicriteria Group Decision Making

A model for determining weights of criteria using subjective and objective information

An integrated multi criteria group decision-making model applying fuzzy topsis-critic method with unknown weight information

Heterogeneous multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information: A deviation modeling approach

Bayesian Weighting for Multiple Criteria Group Decision-making with Interval Preference Information

Optimal model of weighting experts in group decision-making based on compatibility criterion

A Method for Multicriteria Group Decision Making with Different Evaluation Criterion Sets

Deriving experts' weights based on consistency maximization in intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making.

A Novel Method for Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Rough-Number-Based Multiple-Criteria Group Decision-Making Method by Combining the BWM and Prospect Theory

Minimizing Group Discordance Optimization Model for Deriving Expert Weights

Attribute Weights Determination Models for Consensus Maximization in Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making

Dynamic Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Method with Automatic Reliability and Weight Calculation

A Compromise Weight for Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making with Individual Preference

Managing Consensus and Weights in Iterative Multiple-Attribute Group Decision Making

Projection Method for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making with Incomplete Weight Information in Linguistic Setting

An Approach to Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making with Uncertain Criteria Weights Considering Incomparability Between Alternatives.

Multi-criteria group consensus model with risk aversion and minimum adjustment

An Interval-Valued Best–Worst Method with Normal Distribution for Multi-criteria Decision-Making