Abstract:Background: Cancer is the second leading cause of death around the world after cardiovascular diseases. Over the past decades, various data mining studies have tried to predict the outcome of cancer. However, only a few reports describe the causal relationships among clinical variables or attributes, which may provide theoretical guidance for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Different restricted Bayesian classifiers have been used to discover information from numerous domains. This research work designed a novel Bayesian learning strategy to predict cause-specific death classes and proposed a graphical structure of key attributes to clarify the implicit relationships implicated in the data set.Results: The working mechanisms of 3 classical restricted Bayesian classifiers, namely, NB, TAN and KDB, were analysed and summarised. To retain the properties of global optimisation and high-order dependency representation, the proposed learning algorithm, i.e., flexible K-dependence Bayesian network (FKBN), applies the greedy search of conditional mutual information space to identify the globally optimal ordering of the attributes and to allow the classifiers to be constructed at arbitrary points (values of K) along the attribute dependence spectrum. This method represents the relationships between different attributes by using a directed acyclic graph (DAG) model. A total of 12 data sets were selected from the SEER database and KRBM repository by 10-fold cross-validation for evaluation purposes. The findings revealed that the FKBN model outperformed NB, TAN and KDB.Conclusions: A Bayesian classifier can graphically describe the conditional dependency among attributes. The proposed algorithm offers a trade-off between probability estimation and network structure complexity. The direct and indirect relationships between the predictive attributes and class variable should be considered simultaneously to achieve global optimisation and high-order dependency representation. By analysing the DAG inferred from the breast cancer data set of the SEER database we divided the attributes into two subgroups, namely, key attributes that should be considered first for cancer diagnosis and those that are independent of each other but are closely related to key attributes. The statistical analysis results clarify some of the causal relationships implicated in the DAG.

Discovering Causal Relations From Cross-Sectional Data

Learning Cluster Causal Diagrams: an Information-Theoretic Approach

Learning Causal Bayesian Networks Based on Causality Analysis for Classification

Practical Approaches to Causal Relationship Exploration

Causality on cross-sectional data: Stable specification search in constrained structural equation modeling

Mining Causal Relationships among Clinical Variables for Cancer Diagnosis Based on Bayesian Analysis

Causal Inference and Related Statistical Methods

Causal Inference and Bayesian Network Structure Learning from Nominal Data

High-dimensional causal discovery based on heuristic causal partitioning

Bivariate Causal Discovery using Bayesian Model Selection

Bagged Random Causal Networks for Interventional Queries on Observational Biomedical Datasets

Causal datasheet: An approximate guide to practically assess Bayesian networks in the real world

Learning Causal Relations in Multivariate Time Series Data

From Undirected Dependence to Directed Causality: A Novel Bayesian Learning Approach

An Introduction to Causal Discovery

Conditional cross-map-based technique: From pairwise dynamical causality to causal network reconstruction

Efficient Algorithms for Approximate String Matching with Swaps

Bayesian inference of causal relations between dynamical systems

A survey of causal discovery based on functional causal model

Discovering Causes and Effects of a Given Node in Bayesian Networks

Causality Reasoning And Discovery For Systems Biology Investigations