Abstract:Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the functional optical zone (FOZ) after correction of high myopic astigmatism and low myopic astigmatism by small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods In this prospective study, 30 patients who received SMILE for high myopic astigmatism correction (cylinderical diopters ≤ − 2.0D) were enrolled in the high astigmatism group (HA). The control group comprised 40 patients who underwent SMILE for low myopic astigmatism correction (LA; cylinderical diopters ≥ − 0.5D). FOZ was delineated as the area outlined by a change of 0.5D relative to the power at the corneal vertex on the total corneal refractive power map. An ellipse-fitting program (MatLab) was used to calculate some parameters of the FOZ. Visual quality evaluations were also conducted, including evaluations of wavefront aberrations, optical quality, and intraocular scattering, and completion of a quality of life questionnaire. All of the right eyes were analyzed in the study. Results The preoperative average treatment spherical equivalent (− 5.77 ± 1.86D vs. − 6.49 ± 1.49D; P = 0.074), lenticule thickness (120.87 ± 23.27 μm vs. 118.53 ± 21.66 μm; P = 0.666), and programmed optical zone (6.58 ± 0.17 mm vs. 6.65 ± 0.18 mm; P = 0.104) were comparable between the HA and LA groups. The long axes (6.99 ± 1.14 mm vs. 5.32 ± 0.61 mm; P < 0.001), short axes (4.66 ± 0.96 mm vs. 4.23 ± 0.64 mm; P = 0.047), and area (25.90 ± 8.03 mm 2 vs. 17.92 ± 4.36 mm 2 ; P < 0.001) of the FOZ were significantly larger in the HA group than in the LA group. The centration of the FOZ were comparable between the two groups (0.62 ± 0.25 mm vs. 0.70 ± 0.25 mm; P = 0.194). Postoperative spherical aberration was lower in the HA group than in the LA group (0.07 ± 0.05 μm vs. 0.14 ± 0.10 μm; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the ocular scatter index (0.80 ± 0.46 vs. 0.73 ± 0.46; P = 0.447), modulated transfer function (MTF) cutoff (37.89 ± 9.79 cpd vs. 39.78 ± 7.45 cpd; P = 0.363), and Strehl in two dimensions (Strehl2D) ratio (0.20 ± 0.04 vs. 0.20 ± 0.04; P = 0.363) between the HA group and the LA group. There were no significant differences in the scores on quality of life between the HA and LA groups (45.88 ± 2.15 vs. 45.64 ± 1.84; P = 0.423). Correlation analysis revealed that increase in the spherical aberration was significantly correlated with the long axes, short axes and area in the FOZ in both groups. Conclusion With a comparable optical design and attempted correction in SMILE, the eyes with higher myopic astigmatism correction achieved larger FOZ than the eyes with lower myopic astigmatism correction. Consequently, less spherical aberration induction was created after higher myopic astigmatism correction. This result may be associated with less corneal volume sculpted by laser for the higher astigmatism treatment, leading to fewer biochemical responses and les change in corneal aspherity. Good retinal image quality and satisfied quality of life were achieved at a comparable level in both study groups.

Corneal Power Distribution and Functional Optical Zone Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis in Patients with Deep Corneal Opacity: Case Series.

Effective Optical Zone Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Calculated with Two Novel Methods

Influence of optical zone on myopic correction in small incision lenticule extraction: a short-term study

Changes in posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction for different myopic diopters

Corneal morphological changes after small incision lenticule extraction for myopic anisometropia

Effective Optical Zone and Centration Following SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Calculated With a Novel Method

Long-term Changes in Corneal Densitometry and Associated Factors Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Moderate and High Myopia

The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism

Long-Term Visual Quality and Pupil Changes after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Eyes without Preoperative Cylinder Refraction

Achieved and Functional Optical Zone in Myopic Eyes with High Astigmatism after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Functional Optical Zone and Visual Quality After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for High Myopic Astigmatism

Predictability of the Achieved Lenticule Thickness in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Correction.

Effective Optical Zone Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: a Review.

COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS FOR COMMUTING k-UNIFORMLY LIPSCHITZIAN MAPPINGS

Comparison of Corneal Power and Astigmatism Between Simulated Keratometry, True Net Power, and Total Corneal Refractive Power Before and after SMILE Surgery

Long-term Visual Quality after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser Assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK) for Low Myopia

A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients

Evaluation of the Difference Between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.

Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering after Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Five-year Stability of Posterior Corneal Surface after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for High Myopia.