Abstract:Background: In previous studies, immediate implant placement in molar sites has been widely applied. Purpose: To study the clinical effect and feasibility of immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing for failing teeth in the maxillary molar area. Material and methods: Patients who required implantation surgry to replace a failing tooth in the maxilla molar region were selected. Patients were randomized into two groups: immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing (test group) or delayed implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing (control group). The outcome criteria were the success rates of implants, Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) data and results of the subjective satisfaction survey performed with a visual analog scale (VAS). Results: All implants had good initial stability after implantation. The survival rate of implants was 100% at 1-year follow-up. At the time of permanent restoration, the differences in average horizontal shrinkage of alveolar bone (W1) on the buccal side between the test group (0.65 ± 0.12 mm) and the control group (1.23 ± 0.32 mm) were statistically significant (P < .0001); however, no statistically significant difference (P = .515) was observed on the palatal side (0.3 ± 0.10 mm vs 0.28 ± 0.08 mm). The difference in vertical resorption of alveolar bone (H1) on the buccal side between the test group (0.60 ± 0.18 mm) and the control group (1.53 ± 0.19 mm) was statistically significant (P < .0001), but no statistically significant difference (P = .190) in the reduction of palatal alveolar bone (0.24 ± 0.12 mm vs 0.29 ± 0.13 mm) was observed. After 1-year loading, no statistically significant difference (P > .05) in vertical or horizontal changes (W2, H2) were identified in the test group or control group. Patient satisfaction in both groups was similar (8.36 ± 1.01 vs 8.14 ± 1.35), and the difference between groups was not statistically significant (P = .638). Conclusion: Immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing is feasible for the maxillary molar area, and the clinical effect is satisfactory.

A evaluation of clinic curative effect of the OSSTEM TS Ⅲ short implants inserted in mandibular molar areas

Clinical Evaluation of Short and Wide-Diameter Implants Immediately Placed into Extraction Sockets of Posterior Areas: A 2-Year Retrospective Study

Retrospective Study of Short Versus Standard Posterior Implants and Analysis of Implant Failure Risk Factors

[A Long-Term Retrospective Clinical Study of Short Dental Implant Restoration].

Clinical Evaluation of Two-Implant-supported Single Molar Restoration

Survival and Complication Rates of Short Implants‐supported Single Crowns in the Posterior Regions with High Crown‐implant Ration (C I)‐ A 10‐year Retrospective Study

A Prospective, Multicentre Study of 6-Mm Short Implants in Posterior Alveolar Bone Supporting Splinted Crowns: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

Immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing for failing teeth in the maxillary molar area: A randomized controlled trial clinical study with one-year follow-up

A 5-10 Year Prospective Clinic Study of Short Dental Implant

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Short Locking-Taper Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region: A 12-Year Retrospective Study.

Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years.

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.

Evaluation of Implant Placement Following Ridge Preservation in Periodontally Compromised Molar Extraction Sockets: Three-year Results of a Prospective Cohort Study.

Clinical efficacy of implant treatment following alveolar ridge preservation or natural healing in the extraction sockets of molars with severe periodontitis

Evaluation of the Therapeutic Efficiency of Mandibular Anterior Implant-Supported Fixed Bridges with Cantilevers

A prospective, multicenter study assessing the DENTSPLY Implants, OsseoSpeed(™) TX, length 6 mm in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year follow-up study.

Are short implants (≤8.5 mm) reliable in the rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prospective clinical-radiological study of the survival and behavior of short implants

A prospective, multi-center study assessing early loading with short implants in posterior regions. A 3-year post-loading follow-up study.

Evaluation of Dental Implants Following Ridge Preservation in Molar Extraction Sockets Affected by Advanced Periodontitis: A 30-Month Postloading Case Series

[A Prospective Cohort Study on the Effect of Implant Restoration Following Micro Crestal Flap-Alveolar Ridge Preservation at Molar Extraction Sockets with Severe Periodontitis].