Abstract:This paper considers a supply chain with one supplier and two retailers. The supplier has limited normal capacity. When the orders of two retailers exceed the capacity, the supplier can satisfy the retailers with the limited normal capacity, or he can start an emergent production to increase his capacity in a short time with a high unit production cost. When the cost of quickly expanding capacity is lower than the market price, it is profitable for the whole system to start the emergent production. But the supplier has no incentives to do additional production if his cost is higher than the wholesale price. To resolve this issue, we propose a supply commitment contract that the supplier will fully fill a retailer’s order if the retailer pays a premium to the supplier. We consider a practical setting that each retailer has private information on her average demand. Two contracting scenarios of the supplier are compared: contracting with the two retailers simultaneously (the simultaneous scenario) and sequentially (the sequential scenario). It is shown that the retailers will adopt the threshold strategy based on their private demand information to pay the premium. By numerically studies, we further illustrate the supplier’s optimal contract choices and the consequent system performance. First, the suppliers always prefer the retailers to move simultaneous although the supplier’s profit is only slightly higher than that of the sequential scenario; second, the supplier sets a lower wholesale price and a higher commitment fee in the sequential scenario than those of simultaneous scenario; finally, the sequential scenario is a better choice from the perspectives of both the whole supply chain system and the retailers. Our research recommends the sequential moving in the supply commitment contract that it benefits the whole supply chain system with only slightly less efficient for the supplier.

Long-Term Partnership for Achieving Efficient Capacity Allocation

Capacity Sharing Between Competing Manufacturers: A Collective Good or a Detrimental Effect?

Supply commitment contract in capacity allocation games

Competition under Dynamic Lot Sizing Costs with Capacity Acquisition

Strategic Dynamic Sourcing from Competing Suppliers with Transferable Capacity Investment

A Capacity Cost-Sharing Contract for a Two-Stage Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Supplier under a Bargaining Power

An Ascending Auction for Freight Forwarder Collaboration in Capacity Sharing

Capacity Sharing: the Impacts of Agreement and Contracting Timing

Capacity Sharing Between Competitors.

Supply chain coordination through capacity reservation contract and quantity flexibility contract

Guarantor Financing in a Four-Party Supply Chain Game with Leadership Influence

Supplier Behavior in Capacity Investment Competition: an Experimental Study

Capacity reservation and utilization for a manufacturer with uncertain capacity and demand

Cost Allocation of Capacity Investment Games

Lateral capacity exchange and its impact on capacity investment decisions

A Bounded Commitment in Vertical Collaborations of New Product Development

Capacity optimization and competition with cyclical and lead-time-dependent demands

Competition under Capacitated Dynamic Lot-Sizing with Capacity Acquisition

Capacity Allocation with Demand Competition in Asymmetric Market

Developing Long-Term Voluntary Partnerships with Suppliers to Achieve Sustainable Quality

Capacity Coordination Schemas for High-tech Supply Chains