Abstract:This study considers a two-stage supply chain (SC) consisting of a single supplier and a manufacturer. When the manufacturer introduces a new product to the market, both the manufacturer and supplier should install production capacity in advance. Since capacity building often takes a long time, the demand is uncertain at the time of capacity decision making. The supplier often makes a conservative decision on capacity building to avoid possible capital risks due to excess capacity, which leads to the so-called double marginalization problem. Various risk-sharing supply contracts have recently been studied in academia to overcome the double marginalization problem. However, most existing studies ignore the bargaining power of each SC member and capacity investment. This study aims to fill the research gap by including capacity investment and bargaining power in the supply contract process. A capacity cost-sharing (CCS) contract is introduced in which the manufacturer shares the supplier’s capacity investment risk. We investigate how to set the contract parameters in the CCS contract to coordinate the supply chain. It is found that the wholesale price and manufacturer’s CCS ratio are negatively proportional to each other, and the manufacturer’s expected profit increases as the CCS ratio (wholesale price) increases (decreases) in the coordinated CCS contract. We show that there exists a CCS contract leading to a coordinated supply chain for a specific range of bargaining power. We also present a new CCS contract for a supply chain with a risk-averse supplier. A numerical illustration is provided to clarify how the contract parameters are determined and to examine the effect of the contract parameters on SC performance. Managerial implications and possible future work are discussed.

Capacity Coordination Schemas for High-tech Supply Chains

Study on supply chain coordination with capacity investment sharing

Supply chain coordination through capacity reservation contract and quantity flexibility contract

Capacity Sharing Between Competing Manufacturers: A Collective Good or a Detrimental Effect?

Capacity-delivery Coordination in Supply Chains: a Cost-Based Approach

Optimal Capacity in A Coordinated Supply Chain

Long-Term Partnership for Achieving Efficient Capacity Allocation

Optimal Decisions for a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Capacity and Demand Information.

Coordination Tactic Of Downstream Capacity Expansion In Supply Chain

A Capacity Cost-Sharing Contract for a Two-Stage Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Supplier under a Bargaining Power

The Coordination Strategy for Two-Tier Supply Chains with a Cost-Sharing Contract in the Cap-and-trade Mechanism

Supply Chain Contract Design of Technology Innovation Collaboration Under Asymmetric Information

A coordination mechanism for a supply chain with demand information updating

Coordinating a Supply Chain with Green Innovation in a Dynamic Setting

Trust-Embedded Coordination In Supply Chain Information Sharing

Supply chain coordination via capacity options with uncertain demand and supply

Supply Chain Coordination of Upstream Technological Innovation Investment under Stochastic Demand

Strategic Dynamic Sourcing from Competing Suppliers with Transferable Capacity Investment

Strategic Capacity Planning Based on Networked Manufacturing for Supply Chain

Achieving Better Coordination Through Revenue Sharing and Bargaining in A Two-Stage Supply Chain

Three-stage Supply Chain Coordination with a Stock-dependent Demand Rate