Centrosymmetric or Noncentrosymmetric? Transition Metals Talking in K 2 TGe 3 S 8 (T = Co, Fe)
Bingheng Ji,Krishna Pandey,Colin P. Harmer,Fei Wang,Kui Wu,Jin Hu,Jian Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01149
IF: 4.6
2021-06-29
Inorganic Chemistry
Abstract:Two new quaternary sulfides K<sub>2</sub>TGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub>(T = Co, Fe) have been synthesized by a high-temperature solid-state routine and flux growth method. The crystal growth process of K<sub>2</sub>TGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub>(T = Co, Fe) was elucidated by <i>in situ</i> powder X-ray diffraction and DSC thermal analysis. The millimeter-sized crystals of K<sub>2</sub>TGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub>(T = Co, Fe) were grown. K<sub>2</sub>CoGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub> crystallizes in a new structure type in centrosymmetric space group <i>P</i><span class="overline">1</span> (no. 2) with unit cell parameters of <i>a</i> = 7.016(1) Å, <i>b</i>= 7.770(1) Å, <i>c</i> = 14.342(1) Å, α = 93.80(1)°, β = 92.65(1)°, γ = 114.04(1)°. K<sub>2</sub>FeGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub> crystallizes in the K<sub>2</sub>FeGe<sub>3</sub>Se<sub>8</sub> structure type and the noncentrosymmetric space group <i>P</i>2<sub>1</sub> (no. 4) with unit cell parameters of <i>a</i> = 7.1089(5)Å, <i>b</i> = 11.8823(8) Å, <i>c</i> = 16.7588(11) Å, β = 96.604(2)°. There is a high structural similarity between K<sub>2</sub>CoGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub> and K<sub>2</sub>FeGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub>. The larger volume coupled with higher degrees of distortion of the [FeS<sub>4</sub>] tetrahedra compared to the [CoS<sub>4</sub>] tetrahedra accounts for the structure's shift from centrosymmetric to noncentrosymmetric. The theory simulation confirms that [TS<sub>4</sub>]<sub>T= Co or Fe</sub> tetrahedra play a crucial role in controlling the structure and properties of K<sub>2</sub>TGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub>(T = Co, Fe). The measured optical bandgaps of K<sub>2</sub>CoGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub> and K<sub>2</sub>FeGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub> are 2.1(1) eV and 2.6(1) eV, respectively. K<sub>2</sub>FeGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub> shows antiferromagnetic ordering at 24 K while no magnetic ordering was detected in K<sub>2</sub>CoGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub>. The magnetic measurements also demonstrate the divalent nature of transition metals in K<sub>2</sub>TGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub>(T = Co, Fe).The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01149?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01149</a>.Powder X-ray diffraction patterns, EDS results, refined crystallographic data, Tauc plots, DFT calculation for K<sub>2</sub>TGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub>(T = Co, Fe), comparison of <i>P</i>1 and <i>P</i><span class="overline">1</span> refined structure models of K<sub>2</sub>CoGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8.</sub>, and comparison of SHG response between K<sub>2</sub>FeGe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>8</sub> and AgGaS<sub>2</sub> (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01149/suppl_file/ic1c01149_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, inorganic & nuclear