Comparing the differences between ELSD and PDA detectors of UPLC in deteminating chlorogenic aicd in Flos Lonicerae

Liu-cun ZHAO,Shi-yun YE,Chun YANG,Chang-hu LIN,Xun ZHAO,Yun GUO

2015-01-01

Abstract:Objective Compare two methods of testing,and which one was better.Provide a reference for rich Flos Lonicera me-dicinal materials quality control method .Methods ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (2.1 ×100 mm,1.7μm)column was adopted and the temperature was 50 ℃.Two solution were acetonitrile (A)and 0.4% acetic acid (B),with the gradient elution of (0 ~2 min,A 7%;2 ~2.3 min,A 7% ~28%;A 2.3 ~10 min,A 28%;10 ~10.5 min,A 28% ~A7%),and velocity gradient (0 ~2~2.3 ~2.6 ~2.8 ~4 ~4.3 ~4.5 ~10.5 min,0.35 ~0.35 ~0.25 ~0.15 ~0.1 ~0.2 ~0.3 ~0.35 ~0.35 ml/min).The detection waveleth was 330 nm .Electronic Levelling Suspension ,The temperature of drift tube was maintained at 60℃, the temperature of nebulizer was 48℃,PMT was 100.with the nitrogen flow rate of 20 psi and column temprerature was 50℃. Results The linear response ranges of Chlorogenic Acid was 0.3045 ~1.5225μg (R2 =0.9994)with PDA and 0.3045 ~1.5225μg (R2 =0.9993)with ELSD respectively.Conclusion Photo -diode array was less about noise,more smooth about base line and more accurate about date than Evaporative Light -scattering Detector.